Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-15
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 35 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Luz Martinez
Photo of Hon. JOHN J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. JOHN J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. EFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO CAPITAL ONE N.A. SBM TO DISCOVER BANK
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(57262301) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LUZ MARTINEZ 3509 W 49TH ST APT 3 CLEVELAND, OH 44102
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(57262300) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(57262299) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(57262298) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(57262297) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  7. UDGMENT ENTRY(57262296) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  8. UDGMENT ENTRY(57262295) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  9. PON THE COMPLAINT AND SUBSEQUENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF PLAINTIFF, CAPITAL ONE N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO DISCOVER BANK, THE COURT FINDS THAT DEFENDANT, LUZ MARTINEZ, HAS FAILED TO ENTER AN APPEARANCE, FILE AN ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE DEFEND THIS MATTER DESPITE BEING DULY SERVED WITH PROCESS ACCORDING TO LAW. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 55, THE COURT HEREBY RENDERS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $2,250.07 TOGETHER WITH INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT AT THE STATUTORY RATE OF 8.00% PER ANNUM AND COSTS OF $258.95. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY SEAN M. WINTERS 0084612 MILITARY SERVICE AFFIDAVIT
  11. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MDJ PACKAGE
  12. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR MARTINEZ/LUZ/ 05/24/2025 17:02:00
  13. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR WINTERS/SEAN/M. 05/24/2025 17:02:00
  14. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR VELAYUDHAN/KRIS/K 05/24/2025 17:02:00
  15. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR MULLEN/DAVID/ 05/24/2025 17:02:00
  16. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 06/17/2025 AT 10:45 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE COURT S CONFERENCE NUMBER (605) 313-5579 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4539808# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND INTERROGATORIES MUST BE SERVED PRIOR TO THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE PARTIES MUST ALSO FILE THIS COURT'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THIS COURT'S TRIAL ORDER IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT JUDGE JOHN J. RUSSO'S WEBPAGE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE AT: HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-JOHN-J-RUSSO/
  17. UMS COMPLAINT(56735577) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LUZ MARTINEZ 3509 W 49TH ST APT 3 CLEVELAND, OH 44102 ANSWER DATE: 05/19/2025
  18. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. RIT FEE
  20. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA REGULAR MAIL
  21. LAINTIFF HAS NOT REISSUED SERVICE AS PROMPTED BY THE COURT IN ITS ORDER DATED 4/9/25. PLAINTIFF TO REISSUE SERVICE BY 4/24/25, OR THE CASE WILL BE DISMISSED. NOTICE ISSUED
  22. REVIEW OF THE DOCKET INDICATES THAT PLAINTIFF'S FIRST ATTEMPT AT SERVICE VIA CERTIFIED MAIL HAS BEEN RETURNED UNCLAIMED. PLAINTIFF TO REQUEST REISSUANCE OF SERVICE VIA REGULAR MAIL FORTHWITH. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56402286 RETURNED 4/7/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MARTINEZ/LUZ/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  24. UMS COMPLAINT(56402286) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LUZ MARTINEZ 3509 W 49TH ST APT 3 CLEVELAND, OH 44102
  25. URSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E), "IF A SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IS NOT MADE UPON A DEFENDANT WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT AND THE PARTY ON WHOSE BEHALF SUCH SERVICE WAS REQUIRED CANNOT SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SUCH SERVICE WAS NOT MADE WITHIN THAT PERIOD, THE ACTION SHALL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UPON THE COURT'S OWN INITIATIVE WITH NOTICE TO SUCH PARTY OR UPON MOTION." PLAINTIFF TO MAINTAIN DILIGENT EFFORTS TO PERFECT SERVICE WITHIN 180 DAYS OF FILING, OR THE MATTER MAY BE DISMISSED. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. RIT FEE
  28. UDGE JOHN J RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  29. EGAL RESEARCH
  30. EGAL NEWS
  31. EGAL AID
  32. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  33. OMPUTER FEE
  34. LERK'S FEE
  35. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more