Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-10
Status Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Criminal Mandamus
Docket 24 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.(SC)
  2. Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  3. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Index. (SC)
  4. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  5. Filed Motion for Stay of District Court Proceedings. (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 312/25) (SC)
  6. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient motion for Stay. Corrected Motion due: 7 days from the date of this order. (SC)
  7. Filed Petitioner's Motion for Stay of District Court Proceedings. (SC)
  8. Filed Notice of Appearance (Ann Dunn as counsel for Real Party in Interest.) (Counsel Updated.) (SC)
  9. Filed Real Party in Interest's Opposition to Motion for Stay of District Court Proceedings. (SC)
  10. Filed Order Directing Supplementation of Appendix and Directing Answer. Although petitioner has provided this court with transcripts of hearings, a notice of reassignment, and a minute order regarding the reassignment of the underlying case, he has not supplied a written order signed and filed by the district court. This court normally will not consider a petition for extraordinary relief in the absence of the challenged written order. Accordingly, petitioner should obtain from the district court a written order memorializing its ruling and file and serve a supplemental appendix containing a copy of the court's written order within 14 days from the date of this order. Respondents shall have 28 days from the date petitioner serves his supplemental appendix to file and serve an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. In addition to addressing the merits of the petition in their answer, real parties in interest should also address the propriety of writ relief. Petitioner shall have 14 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  11. Filed Petitioner's Supplemental Appendix to Petition for Writ. (STRICKEN PER 4/9/25 ORDER). (SC)
  12. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Supplemental Appendix. Corrected appendix due: 14 days. (SC)
  13. Filed Petitioner's Index Volume to Supplemental Appendix to Writ Petition. (SC)
  14. Filed Petitioner's Supplemental Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  15. Filed Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus. "ORDER the petition DENIED." fn1 [ Given our disposition, we deny as moot Mendoza's motion for stay of the district court proceedings. We further vacate the April 1, 2025, order directing the State, on behalf of respondents, to file an answering brief and petitioner to file a reply.] DH/RP/LS (SC)
  16. Petitioner's Rehearing Fee waived. (SC)
  17. Filed Petitioner's Petition for Rehearing. (REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 5/6/25). (SC)
  18. Filed Notice of Rejection of Filed Document - Petition for Rehearing. (SC)
  19. Filed Appellant's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Petition for Rehearing. (SC)
  20. Filed Appellant's Petition for Rehearing. (SC)
  21. Appeal Appellant's Rehearing fee waived. (SC)
  22. Filed Order Granting Motion. Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing is granted. The petition for rehearing was filed on May 6, 2025. (SC)
  23. Filed Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c). DH/RP/LS (SC)
  24. Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur.(SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more