Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-14
Status Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Criminal Mandamus
Docket 20 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Per Curiam Opinion. "Petition granted." Before: Parraguirre/Bell/Stiglich. Majority: Parraguirre/Bell/Stiglich. Because the trial's ongoing status created urgency, we granted the petition for a writ of mandamus in an order filed on March 6, 2025, explaining that this published opinion would follow at a later date. 141 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 39. RP/LB/LS. (SC).
  2. Filed Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  3. Filed Appendix to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Index. (SC)
  4. Filed Appendix to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  5. Filed Order Directing Supplement and Expedited Answer. We direct respondent district judge to enter a written order reflecting any ruling on the use of jury instruction 18, and petitioner shall have until Friday, February 21, 2025, to provide to this court a supplemental appendix. Real party in interest's answer to writ petition due: 5 days. Petitioner shall have 3 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  6. Filed Petitioner's Index Volume to Supplemental Appendix to Writ Petition. (SC)
  7. Filed Petitioner's Supplemental Appendix to Writ Petition. (SC)
  8. Filed Notice of Appearance (Nicole A. Weis as counsel for Real Party in Interest.) (Counsel Updated.) (SC)
  9. Filed Real Party in Interest's Answer to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  10. Filed Real Party in Interest Appendix to Answer to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  11. Filed Real Party in Interest Index Volume to Appendix to Answer to Emergency Writ Petition. (SC)
  12. Filed Petitioners' Reply to Answer to Emergency Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (SC)
  13. Filed Petitioners' Appendix to Reply to Answer to Petition for Writ. (SC)
  14. Filed Petitioners' Index Volume to Appendix to Reply to Answer to Petition for Writ. (SC)
  15. Filed Order Granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus. "We ORDER the petition GRANTED AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS instructing the district court to vacate its order approving the use of jury instruction 18 at trial." A25-RP/LB/LS (SC)
  16. Issued Writ with letter. Original and one copy of writ and copy of order mailed to Attorney John T. Afshar for service upon Judge Jennifer L. Schwartz. (SC)
  17. Filed Petitioners' Certificate of Service of Writ. (SC)
  18. Filed Returned Writ. Original Writ returned. Served on Judge Jennifer Schwartz on March 12, 2025. (SC)
  19. Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur.(SC)
  20. Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.(SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more