Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of San Joaquin County

Court

San Joaquin County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-18
Status Disposed
Type Limited Civil Breach Of Contract
Docket 31 entries
Disposition notice of entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant Mike Vm Transport Inc,|Villavisencio, Ursulino
Photo of Hon. Lee Jayne

Judge

Hon. Lee Jayne

San Joaquin County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  2. Notice of Case Assignment and Scheduling Information.
  3. Attorney, Matthew J Weber, retained for Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc. .
  4. Payment received by Matthew Weber in the amount of $225.00. Receipt number 1045810.
  5. Civil Case Cover Sheet filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  6. Summons issued and filed.
  7. Complaint Limited (amount up to $10,000) filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  8. Hearing regarding: Case Management Conference , set for 12/15/2025 at 8:30 AM before Hon. Jayne Lee in Department 10C.
  9. Proof of Service of Summons as to Ursulino Villavisencio served on 06/26/2025 by Substituted Service. $83.50.
  10. Proof of Service of Summons as to Mike VM Transport Inc, served on 06/26/2025 by Substituted Service. $143.50.
  11. Request for Entry of Default - Civil filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  12. Request for Default against Mike VM Transport Inc,, Ursulino Villavisencio Entered
  13. Case Management Statement filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  14. Hearing re: Case Management Conference held on December 15, 2025.
  15. Hearing regarding: CMC: Judgment , set for 03/13/2026 at 8:30 AM before Hon. Jayne Lee in Department 10C.
  16. Minutes finalized for Case Management Conference held on 12/15/2025 08:30 AM .
  17. Request to Set Default or Uncontested Matter for Hearing filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  18. Hearing regarding: Default Prove-up Hearing , set for 03/13/2026 at 9:00 AM before Hon. Jayne Lee in Department 10C.
  19. Case Management Statement filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  20. AMENDED Request for Entry of Court Judgment filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  21. Brief summary of case in support of request for court judgment filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  22. Declaration Ronald Van De Pol in Support of request for court judgment filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  23. Declaration of Jennifer L William in Support of request for court judgment filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  24. Proof of service filed by Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc..
  25. Case status updated to Disposed.
  26. Judgment by Court entered and filed.
  27. Hearing Result: Vacated
  28. Hearing Result: Vacated
  29. Hearing re: Default Prove-up Hearing held on March 13, 2026.
  30. Minutes finalized for Default Prove-up Hearing held on 03/13/2026 09:00 AM .
  31. Duplicate Judgment by Court entered and filed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more