Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-16
Type Pr Guardian/conserv Adult
Docket 25 entries
Disposition disposed

Parties

Plaintiff Kuttenkuler, Joseph A|An Tine, Barbara
Defendant Kuttenkuler, Quentin Albert
Photo of Hon. Martin Aaron John

Judge

Hon. Martin Aaron John

Boone County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. ase Review Scheduled For filing of available dates. No appearances required. Scheduled For: 08/06/2025; 9:00 AM; AARON JOHN MARTIN; Moniteau
  3. udge/Clerk - Note CASE SET FOR INITIAL STATUS REVIEW ON WED., AUGUST 6, 2025, AT 9:00 A.M. FOR SETTING TRIAL DATE. NO APPEARANCES WILL BE REQUIRED. ATTY FOR PETITIONER AND ATTY FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE AVAILABLE DATES FOR TRIAL FROM AUGUST 6 THROUGH OCTOBER 15, 2025, PRIOR TO STATUS REVIEW. CLERK TO ISSUE ANY REQUIRED NOTICES OF HEARING UPON SETTING OF TRIAL DATE. ATTY FOR PETITIONER ADVISED TO FILE ANY AND ALL REPORTS AND BACKGROUND SCREENINGS AS REQUIRED BY RSMo 475.050.4 AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO TRIAL DATE. ajm/mdt
  4. rder - Special Process Server Mike Marcolla, 307 E Newton St, Versailles, MO 65084
  5. rd Appt Atty for Respondent and Setting Initial Case Review
  6. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE
  7. RIFS/Unredacted Document Second Amended Petition - Unredacted Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  8. mended Filing Second Amended Petition - Redacted Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  9. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE
  10. roposed Order Filed Proposed Order Appointing Special Process Server - Amended Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  11. onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed Amended Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  12. RIFS/Unredacted Document Amended Petition with Petitioner's Signature - Unredacted Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  13. mended Filing Amended Petition with Petitioner's Signature - Redacted. Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  14. udge/Clerk - Note Clerk reviews initial filings and notes the following: 1) Petition is not signed by petitioner. Atty Van Tine hereby notified to file a verified petition with the Petitioner's signature on the petition. 2) Clerk to contact Ms. Bertels to inquire as to her consent to serve as Attorney for Respondent. 3) This court does not require sheriff's service upon respondents. The attorney for respondent may serve the Notice of Hearing to Respondent. However, the spouse of the respondent must also be served the petition as neither one is deemed Incompetent or Disabled at this time. If Atty Van Tine wants them to be served by Special Process Server, a Motion and proposed Order also listing addresses for the proposed process servers will need to be filed in this case, as the Motion and proposed Order filed in this case lacks addresses. Atty Van Tine notified of this entry electronically
  15. R Costs Incp/Dis-w/costs-Asso
  16. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE
  17. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE
  18. onf Gar/Con Background Report Criminal Background Report Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  19. onf Con Financial History Credit Report Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  20. roposed Order Filed Proposed Order Appointing Special Process Server Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  21. otion Special Process Server MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  22. roposed Order Filed Proposed Order Appointing GAL Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  23. otion for Appointment of GAL Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  24. onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER
  25. RIFS/Unredacted Document Unredacted Petition and Exhibits A - D associated to Guardianship and Conservatorship (application) filed on 07/16/2025. Filed By: BARBARA VAN TINE On Behalf Of: JOSEPH A KUTTENKULER Associated Entries: 07/16/2025 - App-Ltrs Grdnshp/Consrhp +

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more