Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-03
Status CLOSED CASE
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 43 entries
Disposition voluntary dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Baker, Dane
Defendant Denning, Charisma
Photo of Hon. Duncan J Scott

Judge

Hon. Duncan J Scott

Santa Rosa County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionCASE CLOSED
  2. DescriptionRECORDED NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  3. DescriptionNOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY
  4. DescriptionNOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  5. DescriptionDEFENDANT NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
  6. DescriptionDEFENDANT RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  7. DescriptionDEFENDANT RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  8. DescriptionNOTICE OF NON OBJECTION AND REQUEST FOR ELECTRONIC COPIES
  9. DescriptionREQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  10. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  11. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY
  12. REQUEST FOR COPIES
  13. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  14. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  15. PLAINTIFFS ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  16. PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
  17. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, CHARISMA DENNING
  18. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S SOCIAL MEDIA INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  19. NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT'S PAST MEDICAL EXPENSE INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  20. NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT'S INITIAL INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  21. DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF
  22. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY
  23. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 1.280(a)(1) DISCLOSURES
  24. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  25. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  26. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  27. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  28. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  29. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  30. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  31. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  32. DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS
  33. Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Demand for Jury Trial
  34. NOTICE OF FINAL SERVICE PURSUANT TO FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO 2021-12
  35. SUMMONS ISSUED CHARISMA DENNING
  36. ORDER TO PLAINTIFF REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  37. SUMMONS ISSUED CHARISMA DENNING
  38. ORDER TO PLAINTIFF REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  39. LETTER TO CLERK
  40. COMPLAINT
  41. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  42. PAYMENT RECEIVED: $417.00 RECEIPT NUMBER MX 2025000365
  43. JUDGE: ASSIGNED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more