Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-07
Status Open
Type E Filing: Petition Harassment (with Violence)
Docket 24 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Evetts, Savannah
Defendant Duinkerken, Marianne
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order
  2. Original Type Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order
  3. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  4. Hearing Time 5:33 PM
  5. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  6. Civil case cover sheet
  7. Request for orders to stop Harassment filed
  8. Order Received for Signature
  9. Comment Forwarded to: 97E Order for: (Proposed) Notice of Hearing
  10. Order Received for Signature
  11. Comment Forwarded to: 97E Order for: (Proposed) TRO
  12. Order Received for Signature
  13. Comment (Pending Hearing) Order After Hearing
  14. Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed
  15. Comment by Deputy Clerk
  16. Order Received for Signature
  17. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 97E Order for: (Proposed) Court Findings TCV-51
  18. TRO Petition Denied
  19. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  20. Comment However, a hearing has been set. Date: Time: 8:30 am Dept: 97E
  21. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  22. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Court Findings x2, Notice Of Hearing x2, Request for TRO x2, Proof Of Service Packet, Responding To Civil Harassment Packet) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: (Savannah Evetts)
  23. Show Cause Regard Harassment
  24. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more