Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-16
Status CLOSED
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 85 entries
Disposition settlement

Parties

Plaintiff Ciarciaglino, Joseph M
Defendant United Services Automobile Ass
Photo of Hon. Scaglione Donald E

Judge

Hon. Scaglione Donald E

Hernando County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ORDER FILED OF ADMINISTRATIVE INACTIVE OR CASE CLOSURES
  2. Case Status set to CLOSED
  3. NOTICE OF - OF SETTLEMENT
  4. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF NON BINDING ARBITRATION AWARD
  5. NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF JOSEPH CIARCIAGLINO ON 043025 AT 9:00 VIA ZOOM FILED BY DEF
  6. NOTICE OF FILING FIRST PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER RULE 1.442 FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND OFFER OF JUDGMENT TO DEF UNDER SECTION 768.79 F.S. FILED BY PLNTF
  7. OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM W/O DEPO FILED BY NON-PARTY MEDICAL HOTSPOTS INC DBA BAILEYS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
  8. AMENDED NOTICE OF: OF NON-BINDING ARBITRATION VIA ZOOM ON 051625 AT 9:00 W/ MEDIATOR JOE PATSKO ESQ FILED BY PLNTF
  9. ORDER FILED ON JOINT STIP TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF NON-BINDING ARBITRATION IS GRANTED - PARTIES SHALL SCHED AN COMPLETE NON-BINDING ARBITRATION NO LATER THAN 053025 DTD 022625
  10. STIPULATION FILED (JOINT) TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF NON-BINDING ARBITRATION
  11. NOTICE OF FILING PROOF OF SERVICE OF DIFFERENTIATED CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (ATTACHED) FILED BY PLNTF
  12. DOCUMENTS FILED - - PLNTFS QUALIFIED WAIVER OF OBJECTION TO DEFS NTC OF PROD FROM NON-PARTIES DATED 021425, AND REQUEST FOR COPIES OF ITEMS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM
  13. CERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION FILED BY DEF
  14. NOTICE OF - OF NON-BINDING ARBITRATION VIA ZOOM ON 032425 AT 9AM MEDIATOR: JOE PATSKO, ESQ
  15. NOTICE OF FILING PROOF OF SERVICE OF COMBINED CMC/PT ORDER SCHED CAUSE FOR PTC AND JURY TRIAL (ATTACHED) FILED BY PLNTF
  16. NOTICE OF - OBJECTION TO DEFS NTC OF PROD FROM NON-PARTIES DATED 020325 FILED BY PLNTF
  17. ORDER FILED - COMBINED CMC/PT ORDER SCHED CAUSE FOR PTC ON 070126 AT 9:30 CRTRM F AND JURY TRIAL TO COMMENCE DURING THE 1 WEEK TRIAL TERM BEGINNING 081026 AT 8:15 CRTRM F DTD 012925
  18. ORDER FILED DIRECTING PARTIES TO NON-BINDING ARBITRATION DTD 012925
  19. ORDER FILED - DIFFERENTIATED CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER DTD 012925
  20. ORDER FILED ON PLNTFS AMENDED MTN FOR SPEEDY TRIAL IS DENIED AS MOOT DTD 012925
  21. Event CIV JRT scheduled on 8/10/2026 at 0815 AM, MX - Judge presiding.
  22. HIGH PRIORITY NOTICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE
  23. NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND CASE STATUS RPT
  24. AMENDED MOTION - FOR SPEEDY TRIAL PURSUANT TO F.S. 415.1115 FILED BY PLNTF
  25. RESPONSE *AMENDED* DEFENDANT'S UPDATED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  26. AMENDED NOTICE OF: OF ELECTRONIC MAIL DESIGNATION FOR SERVICE OBO THE PLAINTIFF
  27. ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL FILED BY UNITED SERVICE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
  28. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF SHELTON MCKEAN OBO DEF AND EMAIL DESIG
  29. HIGH PRIORITY NOTICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE
  30. Judge: SCAGLIONE , DONALD E Assigned
  31. -- END OF TRANSFERRED DOCUMENTS --
  32. TRANSFER RECEIPT
  33. CORRESPONDENCE DATED 0112524 FROM PINELLAS COUNTY CLERK
  34. PLNTFS NOTICE OF WITHDRAW OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
  35. AMENDED COMPLAINT/PETITION
  36. ORDER ON DEFS MTN TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS
  37. CORRESPONDENCE DATED 112024 FROM SEAN M CONAHAN ESQ
  38. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION OF PLNTF
  39. DEFS UPDATED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOC
  40. CORRESPONDENCE DATED 082724 FROM WILLIAM R GOWER III ESQ
  41. AGREED MANDATORY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
  42. PLNTFS AMENDED NOTICE OF AUDIO-VISUALLY RECORDED DUCES TECUM DEPO OF GUNNER WILLIAMS VIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATED BY MILESTONE REPORTING
  43. DEFS NOTICE OF TAKING DEPO OF PLNTF
  44. PLNTFS NOTICE OF TAKING AUDIO-VISUALLY RECORDED DUCES TECUM DEPO OF GUNNER WILLIAMS VIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATED BY MILESTONE REPORTING
  45. PLNTFS AMENDED NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON DEFS MTN TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS, PLNTFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSING TO DEFS MTN TO TRANSFER VENUE AND PLNTFS MTN FOR SPEEDY TRIAL
  46. PLNTFS NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON DEFS MTN TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS, PLNTFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFS MTN TO TRANSFER VENUE AND PLNTFS MTN FOR SPEEDY TRIAL
  47. DEFS NOTICE OF HEARING
  48. PLNTFS MOTION FOR SPEEDY TRIAL PURSUANT TO F.S. 415.1115
  49. ORDER ON RECUSAL AND FOR REASSIGNMENT
  50. PLNTFS ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  51. DEFS NOTICE OF HEARING ON PLNTFS OBJECTION TO DEFS NTC OF PROD FROM NON-PARTIES DATED 050924
  52. PLNTFS FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PROD
  53. DEFS NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEFS MTN TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS
  54. DEFS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF VERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLNTFS INTERROGS
  55. DEFS RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROD
  56. ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FILED BY DEF
  57. PLNTFS NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO DEFS NTC OF PROD FROM NON-PARTIES DATED 050924
  58. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION-NON PARTY FILED BY DEF
  59. PLNTFS RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROD
  60. NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR COURT TO CONSIDER MTN BASED ON WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS W/O HEARING
  61. PLNTFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFS MTN TO TRANSFER VENUE
  62. DEFS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS
  63. ORDER ON JOINT STIP FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
  64. MANDATORY COVID-19 EMERG CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (CMSO)
  65. JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
  66. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AMENDED COMPLAINT
  67. NOTICE - SERV OF INTERROGATORY TO PLNTF FILED BY DEF
  68. DEFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOC TO PLNTF
  69. DEFS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS
  70. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF SHELTON MCKEAN OBO DEF AND EMAIL DESIG
  71. SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED: ON UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION 031324
  72. NOTICE - SERV OF INTERROGATORY TO DEF FILED BY PLNTF
  73. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOC TO DEF FILED BY PLNTF
  74. DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESS FILED BY PLNTF
  75. PETITION/COMPLAINT FILED
  76. SUMMONS ISSUED FOR: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
  77. COVER SHEET
  78. CASE SUMMARY/HISTORY
  79. ORDER ON DEFS MTN TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS DTD 112124
  80. -- THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WERE TRANSFERRED FROM PINELLAS COUNTY
  81. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $400.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  82. Payment received: $400.00 Receipt Number H 957257
  83. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $400.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  84. Judge: Assigned
  85. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $400.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.