Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-28
Status OPEN
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 46 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Kresovic, Vladimir
Defendant Hook, Adrian Jonathan|Hook, Russell
Photo of Hon. Groeb Robert K

Judge

Hon. Groeb Robert K

Gilchrist County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  2. DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOOK AND RUSSELL HOOK'S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR KRESOVIC
  3. NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR KRESOVIC
  4. NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITIONS OF PLAINTIFF LESLIE KRESOVIC
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE AS TO RUSSELL HOOK - SERVED 7-31-24
  6. RETURN OF SERVICE AS TO ADRIAN HOOK - SUBSTITUTE SERVED TO RUSSELL HOOK 7-31-24
  7. DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOOK AND RUSSELL HOOK'S FIRST CERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION FOR PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR KRESOVIC
  8. DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOOK AMND RUSSELL HOOK'S FIRST NOTIC EOF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY FOR PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR KRESOVIC
  9. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
  10. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST CONSORTIUM INTERROGATORIES
  11. PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR KRESOVIC'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  12. PLAINTIFF LESLIE KRESOVIC'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTSFIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF LESLIE KRESOVIC
  13. DEFENDANT RUSSELL HOOK'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  14. DEFENDANT ADRIAN HOOKS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  15. DEFENDANT RUSSELL HOOK'S NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S VLADIMIR KRESOVIC AND LESLIE KRESOVIC HIS WIFE'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  16. DEFENDANT ADRIAN HOOK'S NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S VLADIMIR KRESOVIC AND LESLIE KRESOVIC HIS WIFE'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  17. DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOOK AND RUSSELL HOOK'S NOTIC EOF SERVING CONSORTIUM INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF LESLIE KRESOVIC
  18. DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOOK AND RUSSELL HOOK'S NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR KRESOVIC
  19. DEFENDANT ADRIAN HOOK AND RUSSELL HOOK'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINITFF LESLIE KRESOVIC
  20. DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOOK AND RUSSELL HOOK'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR KRESOVIC
  21. DEFENDANT RUSSELL HOOK'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  22. DEFENDANT ADRIAN HOOK'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  23. RETURN OF SERVICE SUB-SERVED TO RUSSELL HOOK FOR ADRIAN HOOK ON 7/31/24
  24. RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED RUSSELL HOOK ON 7/31/24
  25. NOTICE DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOOK AND RUSSELL HOOK'S NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES
  26. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  27. SUMMONS FOR RUSSELL HOOK-ISSUED BY CLERK
  28. SUMMONS FOR ADRIAN HOOK-ISSUED BY CLERK
  29. Assessment 2 Total Assessed $20.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  30. Receipt
  31. Payment received: $20.00 Receipt Number MX 32917
  32. Assessment 2 Total Assessed $20.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  33. Assessment 2 assessed at sum $20.00
  34. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT RUSSELL HOOK
  35. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT ADRIAN HOOK
  36. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT RUSESELL HOOK
  37. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ADRIAN HOOK
  38. SUMMONS FOR RUSSELL HOOK
  39. SUMMONS FOR ADRIAN HOOK
  40. Judge: Groeb , Robert K Assigned
  41. Payment received: $400.00 Receipt Number MX 32766
  42. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $400.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  43. NOTICE STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
  44. COMPLAINT
  45. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  46. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $400.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more