Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Eastern Appellate Court

Court

Missouri Eastern Appellate Court

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-04-03
Type Ap Worker's Compensation
Docket 22 entries

Docket Entries

  1. edacted Info Flng Sheet Filed Electronic Filing Certificate of Service Filed By: BARBARA TOEPKE On Behalf Of: TREASURER OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND Associated Entries: 07/03/2025 - Respondent's Brief +
  2. espondent's Brief Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: BARBARA TOEPKE On Behalf Of: TREASURER OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND Associated Entries: 07/03/2025 - Redacted Info Flng Sheet Filed +
  3. ase Docketed DIVISION 4: Navarro-McKelvey, Rebeca, P.J.; Gaertner, Gary M., Jr., J.; Dowd, James M., J. September 11, 2025 SOB ***dkt attached****
  4. ote to Clerk eFiling
  5. upplemental ROA Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  6. ourt Order Issued Appellant filed a motion to supplement the legal file, asserting that Exhibits 2, 3 and 15 as filed with this Court are not the original exhibits marked and admitted without objection at the October 23, 2024 hearing. Appellant also alleges that he filed a motion to supplement the record with the Commission on December 23, 2024, which contained accurate copies of the exhibits. Respondent has not filed suggestions in opposition. Appellant describes Exhibit 2 as a June 17, 2021 entry of appearance of James M. Martin filed in Injury No. 15-069406, while the Exhibit 2 filed by the Commission is an entry of appearance Injury No. 11-0164 77. Appellant describes Exhibit 3 as a June 18, 2021 letter bearing a file stamp "received July 6, 2021 , Missouri Attorney General Labor," but the file stamp does not appear in the Exhibit 3 filed by the Commission. Appellant's amended exhibit list, as attached to the motion to supplement, describes Exhibit 15 as "original claim 1/27/2016, settlement order 12/15/2016 primary claim, and setting." Under Rule 100.02(h), we may order the Commission to prepare and file a supplemental record if requested by a party and if we deem the supplemental record to be necessary. Respondent is hereby directed to file a supplemental legal file containing Exhibit 2, James M. Martin's June 17, 2021 entry of appearance in Injury no. 15-069406; Exhibit 3, the June 18, 2021 letter to Kristin Frazier bearing the file stamp "received July 6, 2021, Missouri Attorney General Labor;" and Exhibit 15, "original claim 1/27/2016, settlement order 12/15/2016 primary claim, and setting;" and Appellant's December 23, 2024 motion to supplement the record containing copies of the exhibits in question on or before July 7, 2025.
  7. ppendix Filed Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES M MARTIN On Behalf Of: JOHN W TIPPIT
  8. orrespondence Sent APPENDIX LETTER
  9. ase Screened- Regular Any party wanting oral argument must Respond to this notice within 10 days.
  10. ppendix Filed Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES M MARTIN On Behalf Of: JOHN W TIPPIT
  11. ppellant's Brief Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES M MARTIN On Behalf Of: JOHN W TIPPIT
  12. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: JAMES M MARTIN
  13. ot File Suppl Record on Appl Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES M MARTIN On Behalf Of: JOHN W TIPPIT
  14. enied as Moot Appellant's brief is not due until June 6, 2025. Associated Entries: 05/02/2025 - Mot for Ext Time to File Brief +
  15. ot for Ext Time to File Brief Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES M MARTIN On Behalf Of: JOHN W TIPPIT Associated Entries: 05/05/2025 - Denied as Moot +
  16. ndustrial Relations Info Form Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES M MARTIN On Behalf Of: JOHN W TIPPIT
  17. ecord on Appeal ROA Pages 1-64; TS Vol 1 of 1 pages 1-196; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  18. lerk Remark ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER MAILED TO KARLA S. HOGG. LETTER TO COUNSEL - REMOTE PUBLIC ACCESS.
  19. ismissal Notice Sent Rule 300 Letter E-Sent ~ Need complete case information sheet~ DUE BY APRIL 18, 2025
  20. cknowledgement Letter Sent
  21. OA Filed in Appellate Court
  22. iling Fee Paid RECEIVED CHECK #27239 IN THE AMOUNT OF $70.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more