Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-21
Status CLOSED
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 40 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Schrang, Brian
Defendant Schoelles, Margaret
Photo of Hon. Scaglione Donald E

Judge

Hon. Scaglione Donald E

Hernando County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case 272024CA001029CAAXMX Filed with Clerk on 10/21/2024
  2. FINAL DISPOSITION FORM - DISMISSED BEFORE HEARING
  3. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  4. CORRESPONDENCE DATED 081525 TO JUDGE SCAGLIONE FROM M TODD HINGSON ESQ
  5. Case Status set to CLOSED
  6. SUPPLEMENTAL - RESPONSE TO DEFS REQUEST FOR PROD FILED BY PLNTF
  7. SUPPLEMENTAL - RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  8. NOTICE OF TRIAL: FILED BY PLAINTIFF
  9. NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF BRIAN SCHRANG ON 053025 AT 9:00 VIA REMOTE VIDEO LINK AND REQUEST FOR PROD FILED BY DEF
  10. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROD FILED BY PLNTF
  11. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF VERIFIED ANSWERS TO DEFS AUTOMOBILE INTERROGS FILED BY PLNTF
  12. ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FILED BY THE DEFENDANT
  13. NOTICE OF - CHANGE OF LAW FIRM INFO FILED BY DEF
  14. NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF ASHLEY WARD-SINGLETON, COUNSEL FOR DEF FROM 120825 TO 122225
  15. NOTICE OF - CHARGING LIEN
  16. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISS FILED BY PLNTF
  17. ORDER FILED GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL OBO THE PLAINTIFF
  18. STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF
  19. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION-NON PARTY FILED OBO THE DEFENDANT
  20. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISS FILED BY THE DEFENDANT
  21. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOC TO PLNTF FILED BY DEF
  22. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLNTF FILED BY DEF
  23. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF AUTOMOBILE INTERROGS TO PLNTF FILED BY DEF
  24. ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FILED BY MARGARET SCHOELLES
  25. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ASHLEY WARD-SINGLETON OBO DEF AND EMAIL DESIG
  26. RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUMMONS SERVED ON MARGARET SCHOELLES (SUBST SERVED TO DAVID SCHOELLES) 111824
  27. ORDER FILED - DIFFERENTIATED CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER DTD 111224
  28. HIGH PRIORITY NOTICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE
  29. SUMMONS ISSUED FOR MARGARET SCHOELLES
  30. Payment received: $410.00 Receipt Number H 947525
  31. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $410.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  32. Judge: Assigned
  33. NOTICE - SERV OF INTERROGATORY TO THE DEFENDANT
  34. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE DEFENDANT
  35. COMPLAINT FOR AUTO NEGLIGENCE
  36. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOC TO THE DEFENDANT
  37. SUMMONS ISSUED TO MARGARET SCHOELLES ^BLANK^
  38. COVER SHEET
  39. Filer Selected Confidentiality Flag: NoConfidentialInformation
  40. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $410.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more