Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-25
Status CASE OPEN
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 35 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Dalton, John Edward
Defendant Mills, Karen Ann | Poelker, John
Photo of Hon. Lewis Jeffrey E

Judge

Hon. Lewis Jeffrey E

Walton County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionNOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  2. DescriptionNOTICE OF AMENDED DESIGNATION OF ELETRONIC MAIL ADDRESSES
  3. DescriptionNOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR KAREN ANN MILLS
  4. DescriptionDEFENDANTS' KAREN ANN MILLS AND JOHN POELKER, ANSWER AND AFFERMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  5. DescriptionDESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES
  6. DescriptionDEFENDANT'S ANSWERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  7. DescriptionNOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS
  8. DescriptionAFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE AS TO DEFENDANT KAREN ANN MILLS
  9. DescriptionAFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE AS TO DEFENDANT JOHN POELKER
  10. ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE
  11. ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE
  12. SUMMONS ISSUED TO: KAREN ANN MILLS
  13. SUMMONS ISSUED TO: JOHN POELKER
  14. PAYMENT RECEIVED: $20.00 RECEIPT NUMBER MX 214036
  15. ASSESSMENT 2 ASSESSED AT SUM $20.00
  16. UNSIGNED SUMMONS
  17. UNSIGNED SUMMONS
  18. PROOF OF NONSERVICE ON JOHN POELKER
  19. PROOF OF NONSERVICE ON KAREN ANN MILES
  20. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - STREAMLINED TRACK
  21. SUMMONS KAREN ANN MILLS
  22. SUMMONS JOHN POELKER
  23. PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  24. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
  25. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO DEFENDANT, JOHN POELKER
  26. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, JOHN POELKER
  27. UNSIGNED SUMMONS
  28. UNSIGNED SUMMONS
  29. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
  30. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING, FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, KAREN ANN MILLS
  31. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO DEFENDANT, KAREN ANN MILLS
  32. DESIGNATION OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY E-MAIL ADDRESSES
  33. COMPLAINT
  34. CIVIL COVER SHEET;
  35. PAYMENT RECEIVED: $420.00 RECEIPT NUMBER MX 211827

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more