Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- DescriptionNOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES ANSWERS
- DescriptionRESPONSE TO; REQUEST TO PRODUCE BY PL
- DescriptionRESPONSE TO; REQUEST TO PRODUCE BY PL
- DescriptionRESPONSE TO; REQUEST TO PRODUCE BY PLAINTIFF
- DescriptionRESPONSE TO; .ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
- DescriptionRESPONSE TO; TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE
- DescriptionNOTICE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT ON DEFENDANTS PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE CO.
- DescriptionNOTICE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT ON DEFENDANTS PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE CO.
- DescriptionNOTICE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT ON DEFENDANTS PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE CO.
- NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT ON DEFENDANTS PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE CO
- MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM TECHNICAL VIOLATION OF RULE 1.370, FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AND TO PERMIT LATE FILING OF RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
- RESPONSE TO; PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
- RESPONSE TO; DEFENDANT REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
- RESPONSE TO; DEFENDANT REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
- REQUEST FOR : FIRST REQUEST PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF,
- REQUEST FOR : FIRST REQUEST PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF,
- REQUEST FOR : FIRST REQUEST PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF, SRIKANTH TIRUPATI, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Sr. T., a Minor
- REQUEST FOR : FIRST REQUEST PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF,
- REQUEST FOR : FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
- REQUEST FOR : FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
- NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES
- NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES
- NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES
- NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES
- ANSWER/RESPONSE FILED BY : PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
- Defendant ATTORNEY: MICHELE DENISE MORALES ASSIGNED TO Progressive Select Insurance Company
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIMETO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES
- RETURN OF SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY FOR PROGRESSIVE
- NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S RULE 1.280(a) DISCLOSURE Dated: January 23, 2025
- NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S RULE 1.280(a) DISCLOSURE Dated: January 22, 2025
- NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S RULE 1.280(a) DISCLOSURE Dated: January 22, 2025
- NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S RULE 1.280(a) DISCLOSURE Dated: January 22, 2025
- SUMMONS ISSUED TO PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
- PAYMENT RECEIVED: $410.00 RECEIPT NUMBER XX 2025000535
- JUDGE: ASSIGNED
- ATTORNEY: ASSIGNED TO Srikanth Tirupati as Parent of Sr T
- ATTORNEY: ASSIGNED TO Srikanth Tirupati as Parent of Su T
- ATTORNEY: ASSIGNED TO Srikanth Tirupati
- ATTORNEY: ASSIGNED TO Mrunalini Nagelli
- STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (AOSC 20-23)
- SUMMONS
- NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES
- REQUEST PRODUCTION/COPIES
- REQUEST FOR : ADMISSIONS
- COMPLAINT
- COVER SHEET
- ASSESSMENT 1 ASSESSED AT SUM $410.00
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In