Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-23
Status Open
Type Intellectual Property
Docket 22 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Booth, Colin
Defendant Faulkner, Katherine|Smith, Evan|Highland Park Technologies

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. omplaint electronically filed.
  2. ivil action cover sheet filed.
  3. ase assigned to: DCM Track A - Average was added on 07/24/2024
  4. otice of 93A complaint sent to Attorney General
  5. laintiff Colin Booth's Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server
  6. ndorsement on Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server (#3.0): ALLOWED dated (7/29/24) Notice Sent 7/29/24
  7. ervice Returned for Applies To: Smith, Evan (Defendant)
  8. ervice Returned for Applies To: Faulkner, Katherine (Defendant)
  9. ervice Returned for Applies To: Highland Park Technologies (Defendant)
  10. otice of 93A complaint sent to Attorney General
  11. efendants Evan Smith, Katherine Faulkner, Highland Park Technologies's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  12. efendant Evan Smith, Katherine Faulkner, Highland Park Technologies's Motion to dismiss
  13. atherine Faulkner, Evan Smith, Highland Park Technologies's Memorandum in support of motion to dismiss
  14. pposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss filed by Colin Booth
  15. eply/Sur-reply Defendants' Reply in Further in Support of their Motion to Dismiss
  16. uperior Court Rule 9A Notice of Filing
  17. eneral correspondence regarding Notice of Transfer to Business Litigation Session Accepted into BLS2 Dated 10/15/2024) Notice sent 10/16/2024)
  18. vent Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 12/05/2024 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: By Court prior to date Hon. Debra A Squires-Lee, Presiding Staff: Erin Coronado, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  19. ivil action cover sheet filed.
  20. atter taken under advisement: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 01/09/2025 02:00 PM Has been: Held - Under advisement Hon. Kenneth W Salinger, Presiding Staff: Erin Coronado, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  21. ndorsement on Motion to Dismiss (#8.0): ALLOWED See Decision and Order (dated 1/10/25) notice sent by email Judge: Salinger, Hon. Kenneth W
  22. EMORANDUM & ORDER: Decision and Order Allowing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss: Defendants' Motion to dismiss all claims against them pursuant to MRCP 12(b)(6) is ALLOWED. Final Judgment shall enter dismissing this action with prejudice and providing that Plaintiff shall take nothing from any of the defendants. Judge: Salinger, Hon. Kenneth W (see p#14 for complete decision and Order ) (dated 1/10/25) notice sent by email

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more