Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-10
Status Open
Type E Filing: Petition Harassment (with Violence)
Docket 21 entries

Parties

Plaintiff The Roman Catholic Diocese Of Fresno
Defendant O Donnell, Peter
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer diaz, Maria G

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer diaz, Maria G

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Petition for Injunction prohibiting harassment of employees
  2. Order Received for Signature
  3. Comment Pending Review Order For: Proposed Notice of Hearing
  4. Order Received for Signature
  5. Comment Pending Review Order for: Proposed TRO
  6. Order Received for Signature
  7. Comment Pending Hearing Order for: Proposed Order After Hearing
  8. Order Received for Signature
  9. Comment Pending Review Order For: Court Findings
  10. Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order
  11. Original Type Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order
  12. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  13. Hearing Time 5:33 PM
  14. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  15. Notice of Hearing and TRO
  16. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  17. Comment Temporary Restraining Order Granted. Date: Time: 8:30 am Dept: 97E
  18. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  19. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Court Findings x3, Notice Of Hearing x3, Request for TRO x3, Proof Of Service Packet, Responding To Civil Harassment Packet) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: (Michael W. Berdinella, Attoreney for Petitioner)
  20. Show Cause Regard Harassment
  21. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more