Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- Case Closed.(COA)
- Filed Proper Person Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of Prohibition Under NRAP, Rule 27(e). (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 01/05/23 NOTICE) (COA)
- Filed Proper Person Document "NRAP 27(e) Certificate." (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 01/05/23 NOTICE) (COA)
- Filed Appendix in Support of Proper Person Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of Prohibition Under NRAP, Rule 27(e). (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 01/05/23 NOTICE) (COA)
- Filed Order Regarding Emergency Petition. Petitioners have filed a pro se emergency petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging two district court orders declaring them vexatious litigants and imposing filing restrictions. However, in their appendix, one of those orders?the "Simpson Order" at exhibit 2?does not bear a district court file stamp. Petitioners shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve a supplemental appendix containing a file-stamped copy of the Simpson Order for this court's consideration. Further, having reviewed the petition and petitioners' NRAP 27(e) certificate, this court declines to treat this matter as an emergency requiring a decision within 14 days per NRAP 21(a)(6). The petition will be considered in due course. (COA)
- Filed Real Party in Interest Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and Rescission of Request for Special Notice(COA)
- Filed Order. Pursuant to the notice of withdrawal filed on January 9, 2024, the clerk of this court shall remove attorney Harriet H. Roland of the Roland Law Firm as counsel of record for real party in interest Ginger Stumne. Ms. Stumne shall continue to be represented by Anthony L. Barney of Anthony L. Barney, Ltd.; Kelly H. Dove of Snell & Wilmer, LLP; and Brent L. Ryman of Erickson Thorpe & Swainston, Ltd. fn1[Ms. Roland's notice also states that she "rescinds her previous request for special notice pursuant to NRS 155.030 of petitions, pleadings, notices, documents or other proceedings in the above-entitled case." However, no such request was filed in this matter.] (COA)
- Filed Proper Person Appendix Supplement to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of Prohibition Under NRAP, Rule 27(e)(COA)
- Filed Proper Person Motion. Supplement to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of Prohibition Under NRAP, Rule 27(e)(COA)
- Filed Civil Proper Person Transcript Request Form. Transcript Requested: 10-31-2023(COA)
- Filed Respondent's Notice of Appearance (Erickson, Thorpe & Swainston, LTD., and Brent L. Rymand and Paul M. Bertone, for Respondents.(COA)
- Filed Filed Civil Proper Person Transcript Request Form. Transcript Requested: 10-31-2023(COA)
- Filed Proper Persons Ex-Parte Motion for Order Directing Court Recorder to File Transcripts: Motion for Sanctions, NRAP 13(b). (COA)
- Filed Order. Petitioners have filed a motion asking this court to direct the court reporter to produce the transcript requested in this matter and to sanction the court reporter for filing to timely produce the transcript.On February 1, 2024, petitioner Robert Pilkington (Robert) filed a transcript request form in this court certifying that he requested an October 31, 2023, transcript from Litigation Services on January 22, 2024. Meanwhile, in Docket No. 87936, on February 7, 2024, Robert filed a transcript request form certifying that he requested the October 31, 2023, transcript from Litigation Services on February 1, 2024. To date, Litigation Services has not filed a certificate of delivery of the requested transcript or otherwise communicated with this court in this docket number. However, on May 3, 2024, in Docket No. 87936, court reporter Julie Kernan filed a notice certifying that the October 31, 2023, transcript was prepared, filed in the district court on April 25, 2024, and copies delivered to Robert and counsel for real parties in interest. Under these circumstances, the motion is denied. (COA)
- Filed Proper Person Motion to Consolidate Appeal and Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of Prohibition. Case No. 87936. (COA)
- Filed Real Party in Interest Response to Motion to Consolidate Appeal and Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative. Petition for Writ of Prohibition (COA)
- Filed Proper Person Reply to Response to Motion to Consolidate Appeal and Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative. Petition for Writ of Prohibition.(COA)
- Filed Proper Person Reply to Response to Motion to Consolidate Appeal and Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative. Petition for Writ of Prohibition.(COA)
- Filed Request for Correction of Party Information and Removal from the Service List.(COA)
- Filed Order Denying Motion to Consolidate. On July 8, 2024, the supreme court denied appellants' motion to consolidate this case with the appeal in Docket No. 87936. Accordingly, the motion to consolidate filed in this docket is denied as moot. (COA)
- Filed Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition. Based on our review of the documents before us, we conclude petitioners have not demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Id. at 224, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, "we deny the petition." COA-MG/BB/DW (COA)
- Filed Proper Person (Robert R. Pilkington) Notice of Filing of Transcript 06-26-2023(SC)
- Filed Proper Person (Robert Ray Pilington) Notice of Filing of Transcripts 10-31-2023 (SC)
- Filed Proper Person Motion for Reconsideration Pursuant to NRAP 27. (COA)
- Filed Order Regarding Motion. Petitioner Denise L. Pilkington filed a "Motion for Reconsideration Pursuant to NRAP 27" on August 12, 2024. We elect to construe this motion as a petition for rehearing pursuant to NRAP 40 and will take no action until the filing fee is paid. See NRAP 40(b)(5). Petitioners shall have 7 days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee. If the filing fee is not paid within this time period, the court will not consider the motion. (COA)
- Returned Unfiled Document(Petition for Review)
- Petitioners' Rehearing Fee Paid. $150.00 from Robert Pilkington. (COA)
- Filed Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c). COA-MG/BB/DW (COA)
- Transferred to Supreme Court.(COA)
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In