Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Georgia Unified PeachCourt

Court

Georgia Unified PeachCourt

Georgia

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-06
Type Child Support Modification
Docket 17 entries
Disposition pending

Parties

Plaintiff Lowe, Magnolia B
Defendant Lowe, Steven D
Photo of Hon. Arthur L Smith Iii

Judge

Hon. Arthur L Smith Iii

Harris County (GA)

Georgia

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. KD 02/06/2025 BISHOP
  2. KD
  3. KD FOR MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORTAND MOTION TO STAYCURRENT CHILD SUPPORT ORDER
  5. SM-E- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  6. AR-E-PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT
  7. SM-E-P- EMAIL CORR RE SCHEDULING OF ITEMS
  8. SM-E- PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT
  9. SM-E- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH PLAINTIFF???S FIRST AMENDED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS INCLUDING VA FORM 21-526 AND VA FORM 10-5345
  10. SM-E-P- ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE PENDING MOTIONS FOR JOINT HEARING 05/30/2025 SMITH
  11. SM-E-P- ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE PENDING MOTIONS FOR JOINT HEARING 05/30/2025 SMITH
  12. SM-E-P- EMAIL CORR RE EX PARTE COMMUNICATION
  13. LF-E- EMAIL THREAD 05.30.25 AND 06.01.25
  14. AR-E-EMAIL CORR TO CLERK
  15. SM-E-ANSWER, DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIM
  16. SM-E- RULE NISI 07/09/2025 @9:30 AM SMITH
  17. SM-E- MOTION TO COMPEL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more