Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- rd of Protection Served Document ID - 25-AFOP-32; Served To - DAVID DORTHY; Served Date - 02/26/2025; Served Time - 17:47:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
- FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
- rotection Order Issued Document ID: 25-AFOP-32, for DORTHY, DAVID
- FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
- udmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 02/26/2026; Renewal Expiration Date - 02/26/2027; Original Motion to Object Date - 01/26/2027; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Petp awarded custody - YES; Finds Resp a Serious Danger - YES;
- ried by Court-Civil
- ull Order of Protection
- dult Abuse Hearing Held Petitioner appears pro se. Respondent does not appear, although duly served. Evidence is heard. The Court finds that it has jurisdiction as the parties both resided in Oregon County and the incident occurred in Oregon County. The Court finds that the parties resided together in an intimate relationship and have children in common. The Court finds that Respondent engaged in violent conduct, threats, harassment and intimidation without justification. The Court finds that Petitioner has a reasonable basis for her concern for her safety. The Court enters a full order of protection for a term of two years with automatic renewal for a term of one year. Custody of the minor children is placed with Petitioner. Harvey S. Allen Associated Entries: 02/11/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 02/26/2025; 2:00 PM; HARVEY SHANE ALLEN; Oregon
- rd of Protection Served Document ID - 25-AEOP-65; Served To - DAVID DORTHY; Served Date - 02/11/2025; Served Time - 18:01:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
- EXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order was submitted for electronic processing
- x Parte Order Issued Document ID: 25-AEOP-65, for DORTHY, DAVID
- xParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Petp granted poss/residence - YES;
- onfid Dom Rel Info File Sheet CONFIDENTIAL FILING SHEET. ao
- dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 02/26/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 02/26/2025; 2:00 PM; HARVEY SHANE ALLEN; Oregon
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
