Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Southern Appellate Court

Court

Missouri Southern Appellate Court

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-03
Type Ap Writ Of Mandamus
Docket 8 entries

Docket Entries

  1. aiver Signed wavier of service
  2. reliminary Writ Issued NOW, THEREFORE, the Court, pursuant to Rule 84.24(e), does hereby dispense with the time limits set forth in Rule 84.24(c)-(d) in this case. Further, it is hereby ordered that this, a Preliminary Writ of Mandamus, be issued out of and under the seal of this court, directed to you, the Honorable Kacey Proctor, whereby you are directed to file your answer to relator's petition on or before June 19, 2025. Failure to file an answer may result in entry of a final order for the relief requested in relator's petition. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with Rule 84.24(h).
  3. cknowledgement Letter Sent
  4. lerk Remark Case assigned to division comprising Judges Bates, Goodman, and Growcock.
  5. ivision Assigned
  6. ervice on Respondent Filed By: ROSE ANN SHAW
  7. rit Summary Filed Filed By: ROSE ANN SHAW
  8. ot to Proc in Forma Pauperis Filed By: ROSE ANN SHAW

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more