Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of San Diego Court

Court

San Diego Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-24
Status Pending
Type (u)breach Of Contract/warranty: Breach Of Contract
Docket 19 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Cresen Inc
Defendant Bryan Garnier Advisory Llc|Bryan, Garnier & Co Ltd|Davison, Paul Owen|Hegener, Jason
Photo of Hon. Joel R. Wohlfeil

Judge

Hon. Joel R. Wohlfeil

San Diego County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Request for Dismissal of Party, Cause of Actn, or Cross-Comp With Prejudice as to Bryan Garnier & Co LTD and Bryan Garnier Advisory LLC Filed By: Plaintiff Cresen Inc Refers To: Defendant Bryan, Garnier & Co LTD Defendant Bryan Garnier Advisory LLC
  2. Notice of Rescheduled Hearing
  3. Proof of Service Filed by Paul Owen Davison, Jason Hegener Filed By: Defendant Davison, Paul Owen Defendant Hegener, Jason
  4. Stipulation - Fee Due to Continue Case Management Conference Filed by Cresen Inc, Paul Owen Davison, Jason Hegener Filed By: Defendant Davison, Paul Owen Defendant Hegener, Jason Plaintiff Cresen Inc
  5. (Cancelled) Motion Hearing Motion to extend time to respond Hearing Date: 2/14/2025 09:00 AM Judges: Central, C-73; WOHLFEIL, JOEL R; Department: C-73 Cancellation Reason: Vacated
  6. (Cancelled) Demurrer/Motion to Strike Demurrer as to Davidson & Hegener Hearing Date: 1/24/2025 09:00 AM Judges: Central, C-73; WOHLFEIL, JOEL R; Department: C-73 Cancellation Reason: Off Calendar by Defendant
  7. Proof of Service Filed by Paul Owen Davison, Jason Hegener Filed By: Defendant Davison, Paul Owen Defendant Hegener, Jason Refers To: Plaintiff Cresen Inc
  8. Stipulation and Order Signed on 1/6/25 To Extend Defendants Paul Owen Davison and Jason Hegeners Time To Respond to Complaint Filed by Cresen Inc, Paul Owen Davison, Jason Hegener Filed By: Defendant Davison, Paul Owen Defendant Hegener, Jason Plaintiff Cresen Inc
  9. Proof of Service Proof of Service Refers To: Defendant Davison, Paul Owen Defendant Hegener, Jason
  10. Declaration DECLARATION OF ADAM S. CASHMAN REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Refers To: Defendant Davison, Paul Owen Defendant Hegener, Jason
  11. Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Refers To: Plaintiff Cresen Inc
  12. Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Refers To: Plaintiff Cresen Inc
  13. Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Refers To: Plaintiff Cresen Inc
  14. Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Refers To: Plaintiff Cresen Inc
  15. System Generated Notice E-mailed [email protected]
  16. System Generated Notice E-mailed [email protected]
  17. System Generated Notice E-mailed [email protected]
  18. Stipulation to Alternative Dispute Resolution Process
  19. Notice to Litigants

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more