Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of San Diego Court

Court

San Diego Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-30
Status Pending
Type (u)other Employment
Docket 19 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hurtado, Alejandro M.
Defendant Inland Valley Pipeline Inc|Near Cal Corp.|South East Employee Leasing Services
Photo of Hon. Michael D Washington

Judge

Hon. Michael D Washington

San Diego County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Answer/Response/Denial (Unlimited) Answer and Affirmative Defenses of Defendant Near-Cal Corp. Filed by Near-Cal Corp. Filed By: Defendant Near-Cal Corp.
  2. Request for Dismissal of Party, Cause of Actn, or Cross-Comp Without Prejudice - South East Employee Leasing Services Filed by Alejandro M. Hurtado Filed By: Plaintiff Hurtado, Alejandro M. Refers To: Defendant South East Employee Leasing Services
  3. Case Management Conference Hearing Date: 4/18/2025 09:00 AM Judges: North, N-31; WASHINGTON, MICHAEL D.; Department: N-31
  4. Minute Order
  5. Notice of Jury Fee Deposit Notice of Jury Fee Deposit Filed by Inland Valley Pipeline Inc Filed By: Defendant Inland Valley Pipeline Inc
  6. Rejected Filing Case Management Statement
  7. Answer/Response/Denial (Unlimited) Filed by Inland Valley Pipeline Inc Filed By: Defendant Inland Valley Pipeline Inc
  8. Case Management Conference Hearing Date: 3/14/2025 09:00 AM Judges: North, N-31; WASHINGTON, MICHAEL D.; Department: N-31
  9. Minute Order #4 - Complaint (Unlimited)
  10. Order - Other Order Regarding Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint Filed by South East Employee Leasing Services Filed By: Defendant South East Employee Leasing Services
  11. Case Management Statement 2-28-25 CMS ALejandro Hurtado v. Inland Valley Pipeline Inc.pdf (Statements) Filed by Alejandro M. Hurtado Filed By: Plaintiff Hurtado, Alejandro M.
  12. Stipulation - Fee Due Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint Filed by South East Employee Leasing Services Filed By: Defendant South East Employee Leasing Services
  13. Amended Complaint Filed by Alejandro M. Hurtado Filed By: Plaintiff Hurtado, Alejandro M. Refers To: Defendant Inland Valley Pipeline Inc Defendant Near-Cal Corp. Defendant South East Employee Leasing Services
  14. System Generated Notice E-mailed [email protected]
  15. System Generated Notice E-mailed [email protected]
  16. System Generated Notice E-mailed [email protected]
  17. Stipulation to Alternative Dispute Resolution Process
  18. Notice to Litigants
  19. Notice of Case Assignment

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more