Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Riverside Co

Court

Riverside Co

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-18
Status Active
Type Unlimited Civil Defamation
Docket 53 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Natalie Mary Moton Doing Business As: Namaste Farms
Defendant Oliver Gibson|Joni Gibson
Photo of Hon. Chad W Firetag Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed Chad W Firetag

Judge

Hon. Chad W Firetag Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed Chad W Firetag

Riverside County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Summons Issued and Filed
  2. Certificate of Counsel.
  3. Civil Case Cover Sheet
  4. Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000)
  5. Notice of Case Management Conference Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000)
  6. Notice of Department Assignment
  7. Notice of Related Cases
  8. Amended Notice of Related Cases on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  9. Notice of Case Reassignment to Department
  10. Peremptory Challenge CCP 170.6 as to Judge Raquel Marquez
  11. Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  12. Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  13. Notice of Document Return.
  14. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  15. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  16. Special Motion to Strike on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  17. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  18. Plaintiff Natalie Mary Moton’s Notice Of Lodging Non-Paper Exhibit Pursuant To California Rules Of Court, Rule 8.74 In Support Of Her Opposition To The Special Motion To Strike C.C.P. 425.16 Of Defendants Joni Gibson on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  19. Declaration Of Sean Redding In Support Of Opposition Of Plaintiff Natalie Mary Moton To The Special Motion To Strike C.C.P. 425.16 Of Defendants Joni Gibson And Oliver Gibson; Request For Monetary Sanctions
  20. Declaration Of Natalie Mary Moton In Support Of Her Opposition To The Special Motion To Strike C.C.P. 425.16 Of Defendants Joni Gibson And Oliver Gibson; Request For Monetary Sanctions
  21. Declaration Of Marty E. Zemming, Esq. In Support Of Opposition Of Plaintiff Natalie Mary Moton To The Special Motion To Strike C.C.P. 425.16 Of Defendants Joni Gibson And Oliver Gibson; Request For Monetary Sanctions
  22. Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To The Special Motion To Strike C.C.P. 425.16 Of Defendants Joni Gibson And Oliver Gibson
  23. Plaintiff’s Evidentiary Objections To Declarations Filed In Support Of Defendants’ Special Motion To Strike on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  24. Opposition Of Plaintiff Natalie Mary Moton To The Special Motion To Strike C.C.P. 425.16 Of Defendants Joni Gibson And Oliver Gibson; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Request For Monetary Sanctions on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  25. Lodged "Exhibit in the form of one (1) Thumb" for Notice of Lodgment filed on 12/19/24
  26. Objection to Declaration of Sara Kelley Submitted in Reply to the Opposition to the Special Motion to Strike [C.C.P. 425.16] of Defendants Joni Gibson and Oliver Gibson on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  27. Reply Brief on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  28. Notice of Errata re: Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to Declarations Filed in Support of Defendants' Special Motion to Strike on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  29. Notice of Ruling re: January 8, 2025 on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  30. Tentative Ruling dated 1-8-25 is the final ruling – Ordered filed-
  31. Minute Order: Hearing on Anti-SLAPP Motion (Special Motion to Strike) by JONI GIBSON, OLIVER GIBSON
  32. Case Management Statement untimely pursuant to CRC 3.725 on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  33. Case Management Statement untimely pursuant to CRC 3.725 on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  34. Minute Order: Case Management Conference
  35. Answer to Complaint on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  36. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  37. Notice of Errata on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  38. Proof of Service re: (Proposed) Order re: Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  39. (Proposed) Order re: Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  40. Plaintiff's Separate Statement in Support of Her Motion for an Order to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  41. Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One to Defendant Joni Gibson Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  42. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  43. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  44. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  45. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  46. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  47. Notice of Document Return.
  48. Notice of Non-Opposition Received to Plaintiff Natalie Mary Motion's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents Set One
  49. Notice of Errata re: Plaintiff Natalie Mary Motion's Separate Statement in Support of Her Motion for an Order to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One on Complaint for Defamation (Over $35,000) of NATALIE MARY MOTON
  50. Notice of Document Quality Assurance
  51. Order re: Plaintiff Natalie Mary Moton's Notice of Motion & Motion for an Order to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One & Request for monetary sanctions
  52. Tentative Ruling dated 5-19-25 is the final ruling – Ordered filed-
  53. Minute Order: Hearing re: Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One by NATALIE MARY MOTON

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more