Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-09
Type Cc Suit On Account
Docket 26 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District|Bozarth, Raymond Paul|Wool, Tammy Fay
Defendant Wilson, Andrea C
Photo of Hon. Moriarty Joan L

Judge

Hon. Moriarty Joan L

St. Louis city (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. et Filed in Circuit Ct Petition. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
  2. udgment Entered
  3. earing/Trial Cancelled Associated Entries: 10/31/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Associated Entries: 10/31/2025 - Jury Trial Scheduled Scheduled For: 01/26/2026; 9:00 AM; JOAN L MORIARTY; City of St. Louis
  4. efault Judgment
  5. rder DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant ANDREA C WILSON called and heard. Plaintiff appears by counsel; no appearance by Defendant. The Court finds that Defendant was served more that thirty (30) days prior to this judgment, has failed to file any response or answer, and is now in default. Plaintiffs Affidavit attached to Plaintiff's petition and to the Motion for Default Judgment establishes the total damages due and owing Plaintiff. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED and Judgment is entered for Plaintiff against Defendant ANDREA C WILSON as follows: Principal: $75.173.57 Interest: $0 Attorney Fees: $450.00 Total: $75,623.57 plus interest on the judgment at 0.00% per annum and court costs, including charges incurred for electronic filings in this action. Plaintiff requests an award of special process server fees of $70,00, which the Court finds reasonable and orders taxed as costs. SO ORDERED: Judge Joan L. Moriarty #33057
  7. otion Hearing Held Associated Entries: 10/21/2025 - Motion Hearing Scheduled + Scheduled For: 11/19/2025; 9:30 AM; JOAN L MORIARTY; Carnahan Courthouse
  9. ury Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 11/21/2025 - Hearing/Trial Cancelled Scheduled For: 01/26/2026; 9:00 AM; JOAN L MORIARTY; City of St. Louis
  10. earing Continued/Rescheduled Continuance Reason - CNRCD Â Cause not Reached; Continuance Requestor - COURT Â Court Associated Entries: 07/21/2025 - Jury Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 11/21/2025 - Hearing/Trial Cancelled Hearing Continued From: 12/01/2025; 9:00 AM Jury Trial
  12. otion Hearing Scheduled Motion for Default Judgment Associated Entries: 11/19/2025 - Motion Hearing Held Scheduled For: 11/19/2025; 9:30 AM; JOAN L MORIARTY; Carnahan Courthouse
  14. otion for Default Judgment Motion for Default Judgment; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
  15. otice of Hearing Filed Notice of Hearing; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
  16. mended Notice of Hrng Filed Amended Notice of Hearing Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
  17. earing/Trial Cancelled Associated Entries: 08/04/2025 - Motion Hearing Scheduled + Scheduled For: 09/08/2025; 9:30 AM; JOAN L MORIARTY; Carnahan Courthouse
  18. otion for Default Judgment Motion for Default Judgment. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
  19. otice of Hearing Filed Notice of Hearing. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
  20. otion Hearing Scheduled Motion for Default Judgment Associated Entries: 09/04/2025 - Hearing/Trial Cancelled Scheduled For: 09/08/2025; 9:30 AM; JOAN L MORIARTY; Carnahan Courthouse
  21. ury Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 10/31/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 12/01/2025; 9:00 AM; CHRISTOPHER EDWARD MCGRAUGH; City of St. Louis
  22. amily Member/Roommate Served Document ID - 25-SMCC-3532; Served To - ANDREA C WILSON; Served Date - 06/22/2025; Served Time - 10:16:00; Service Type - SP; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
  23. otice of Service Service Affidavit. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
  24. ummons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 25-SMCC-3532, for WILSON, ANDREA C.
  25. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL
  26. otion Special Process Server Motion for Special Process Server. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more