Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-12
Type Protective Order
Docket 23 entries
Photo of Hon. Gatlin, S Brooke

Judge

Hon. Gatlin, S Brooke

Washita County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  2. OKLA. COURT INFO. SYSTEM FEE - EFF 7/1/04
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  6. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  11. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  12. ISSUING ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR
  13. PROTECTIVE ORDER (WCSO) HEARING DATE: 5/25/25 AT 9:00 AM
  14. CLERK'S NOTE: HAND DELIVERED COPY TO PETITIONER; COPY TO
  15. FILING ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - ARTHUR KENWORTHY SERVED5/14/25 BY BECKHAM CO. SHF. DEPT.
  16. CM: SBG/A PETITIONER DOES NOT APPEAR AND IS EXCUSED. RESPONDENT APPEARS THIS MORNING FOR ATTORNEY DATE IN HIS CRIMINAL CASE. BY ORDER OF THE COURT, HEARING IN THIS MATTER IS CONTINUED TO JUNE 3, 2025 AT 9:00 A.M. IN ORDER TO HAVE A COURT REPORTER PRESENT AND COMPLY WITH ADA ACCOMODATIONS THAT THE RESPONDENT HAS REQUESTED. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WILL CONTACT PETITIONER AND ADVISE HER OF THE NEW COURT DATE.
  17. FINAL ORDER OF PROTECTION (HAND DEL TO PET; DEF; WCSO; CORDELL PD; MAILED COPY TO BECKHAM CO SHF DEPT; ELK CITY PD)
  18. CM: SBG- THE COURT HAS REVIEWED THE DEFENDANT'S LETTER RE: HIS COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE ADA ACCOMODATIONS THE COURT HAS MADE FOR HIM. SPECIFICALLY, THE DEFENDANT PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED A COURT REPORTER FOR SIMULTANEOUS TRANSCRIPTION DUE TO HIS DIFFICULTY HEARING. ON 6/3/2025, THE COURT PROVIDED EXACTLY THE SERVICE THAT DEFENDANT REQUESTED. THE COURT REPORTER ASKED THAT THE DEFENDANT STAND WHERE BOTH SHE AND THE DEFENDANT COULD SEE THE LAPTOP SCREEN SO SHE COULD VERIFY ACCURACY IN REAL TIME. COURT REPORTING IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE AND WITH SIMULTANEOUS TRANSCRIPTION, THE REPORTER HAS NO OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE TRANSCRIPT AFTER THE FACT AND CORRECT ANY MISSED KEYSTROKES, ETC. SHE ASKED THAT IT BE DONE THIS WAY TO MAKE SURE THE INFORMATION MR. KENWORTHY WAS READING IN REAL TIME WAS ACCURATE. THE COURT UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS METHOD MAY BE LESS THAN IDEAL BUT IT IS THE BEST ACCOMODATION THAT IS AVAILABLE GIVEN THE EQUIPMENT THAT OUR REPORTERS HAVE. THE COURT WOULD NOTE THAT THE COURT IS REQUIRED TO MAKE "REASONABLE ACCOMODATIONS." WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THOSE ACCOMODATIONS IN THE EXACT MANNER THAT THE DEFENDANT THINKS IS IDEAL. THE COURT HAS MADE REASONABLE ACCOMODATIONS TO ENSURE THAT DEFENDANT HAS A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN HIS HEARING. FURTHER, DEFENDANT SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED THE COURT USE SHERRI WALDROP, CSR, AS SHE HAD DONE SOME REPORTING ON A CASE IN ANOTHER COUNTY PREVIOUSLY. THE COURT NOTES THAT MS. WALDROP IS THE REPORTER WHO HANDLED THIS MATTER ON 6/3/2025 AND SHE DID SO CONSISTENT WITH HER PREVIOUS PRACTICE. NO CHANGES TO THE ACCOMODATION ARE NECESSARY.
  19. NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF COMMUNICATION
  20. RULE 8 PAYMENT ORDER - $25.00 DUE MONTHLY BEGINNING 07/07/2025
  21. MARSDEN MOTION - DEFENDANT
  22. APPEAL FINAL ORDER APPEALING THE CONVICTION - DEFENDANT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more