Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-19
Type Ac Suit On Account
Docket 22 entries
Disposition consent judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Safe Haen Security, Inc.|Rabin, Daniel Scott
Defendant Contreras, Thomas
Photo of Hon. |MARQUART, KEITH

Judge

Hon. |MARQUART, KEITH

Andrew County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 23-GARN-2260; Served To - STATIONERY CREDIT UNION; Server - ; Served Date - 02-NOV-23; Served Time - 11:50:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  4. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 23-GARN-2260 for THOMAS CONTRERAS; returnable date: 27-NOV-2023; Garnishee: STATIONERY CREDIT UNION
  6. equest for Execution/Garnish REQUEST OF GARNISHMENT. Filed By: DANIEL SCOTT RABIN On Behalf Of: SAFE HAVEN SECURITY, INC.
  8. udgment Entered COSTS ASSESSED TO DEFENDANT(S) $1373.22 - PRINCIPAL
  10. onsent Judgment
  11. rial Setting Held Associated Entries: 07/20/2022 - Trial Setting Scheduled Scheduled For: 08/31/2022; 10:00 AM; KEITH MARQUART; Buchanan
  12. ound Recording Log Sheet
  13. otice of Service Service Affidavit. Filed By: DANIEL SCOTT RABIN On Behalf Of: SAFE HAVEN SECURITY, INC.
  14. ummons Personally Served Document ID - 22-ADSM-1602; Served To - THOMAS CONTRERAS; Served Date - 07/28/2022; Served Time - 17:27:00; Service Type - SP; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
  15. rder - Special Process Server SIGNED BY DEPUTY CLERK
  16. ummons Issued-Associate Document ID: 22-ADSM-1602, for CONTRERAS, THOMAS.
  17. rial Setting Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/31/2022 - Trial Setting Held Scheduled For: 08/31/2022; 10:00 AM; KEITH MARQUART; Buchanan
  18. udge Assigned
  19. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: DANIEL SCOTT RABIN
  20. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: DANIEL SCOTT RABIN
  21. roposed Order Filed Order for Special Process Server. Filed By: DANIEL SCOTT RABIN On Behalf Of: SAFE HAVEN SECURITY, INC.
  22. otion Special Process Server Motion for Special Process Server. Filed By: DANIEL SCOTT RABIN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more