Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-25
Type Civil Relief Breach Of Contract More Than $10,000
Docket 88 entries
Disposition Judgment
Photo of Hon. Schneiter Lance E

Judge

Hon. Schneiter Lance E

Garfield County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION - CIVIL (CJ OVER 10,000.)
  2. LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 7/1/04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  11. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - JEFFREY J BOX
  16. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - MARVEL E LEWIS
  17. ISSUING 2 SUMMONS -TO ATTY
  18. PROOF OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
  19. PROOF OF SERVICE - (SUMMONS) - PERSONAL SERVICE -
  20. MICHAEL R HICKS - 2-10-22
  21. ANSWER - MICHAEL R HICKS - PRO SE
  22. NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL
  23. ORDER
  24. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
  25. MOTION TO WITHDRAW - JEFFREY J BOX
  26. ORDER - JEFFREY J BOX
  27. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER AND MOTION TO
  28. ENTER ON JURY TRIAL DOCKET
  29. NOTICE OF HEARING
  30. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL R HICKS
  31. CM- PLAINTIFF BY LEWIS. DEFENDANT PRESENT BY BATTSON.
  32. AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED.JMC
  33. AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
  34. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  35. MOTION TO LEAVE TO ALLOW JOSEPH P DOWDELL TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD
  36. ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY JOSEPH P DOWDELL
  37. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  38. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM - A CLAIM SERVICE OF OK LLC
  39. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM - ENVISTA FORENSICS LLC
  40. OFFER OF JUDGMENT
  41. PLAINTIFFS' ACCEPTANCE OF DEFENDANT HANOVER INSURANCE COMPAN'S OFFER TO CONFESS JUDGMENT
  42. MOTION TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AS TO BREACH OF INSURANCE CONTRACT CLAIM ONLY
  43. MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT
  44. PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT
  45. HANOVER RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AS TO BREACH OF INSURANCE CONTRACT CLAIM ONLY
  46. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO HANOVER'S MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT
  47. PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANT HANOVER'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY
  48. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY
  49. PETITION FOR CERTIORARI CERTIFIED INTERLOCUTORY ORDER
  50. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  51. APPLICATION TO ASSUME ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
  52. NOTICE OF ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS
  53. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION TO ASSUME ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND PETITION
  54. PETITIONER'S APPENDIX TO APPLICATION TO ASSUME ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
  55. CERTIFICATE OF APPEAL
  56. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  57. RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI CERTIFIED INTERLOCUTORY ORDER
  58. REAL PARTIES-IN-INTEREST PROGRESSIVE WELL SERVICE INC., RANDY MATTHEWS, AND BILLY MATTHEWS' RESPONSE TO PETITIONER HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY'S APPLICATION TO ASUME ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  59. NOTICE OF PREVIOUS FEDERAL FILING OF HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY'S ANSWER
  60. ORDER FROM THE SUPREME COURT
  61. MANDATE - DISMISSED
  62. RECEIPT FOR MANDATE
  63. SECOND AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
  64. DEFENDANT HANOVER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF RANDY MATTHEWS
  65. PLAINTIFF RANDY MATTHEW'A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY ONLY
  66. DEFENDANT HANOVER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF BILLY MATTHEWS
  67. PLAINTIFF BILLY MATTHEWS' DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY ONLY
  68. NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM AND ADDRESS
  69. CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATED & AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
  70. PLAINTIFF'S SECOD FINAL WITNESS & EXHIBIT LIST
  71. DEFENDANT HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY'S FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS
  72. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR SUMMARY DISPOSITION
  73. HANOVER'S MOTION TO STRIKE GENERIC LISTINGS OF WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS FROM PLAINTIFF'S FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  74. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DAMAGES
  75. NOTICE OF HEARING
  76. PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR FURTHER PLEAD AND REQUEST FOR ALL REMAINING DEADLINES IN THE DECEMBER 5, 2024 SECOND AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER TO BE EXTENDED 60 DAYS
  77. ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AN ADDITIONAL OF TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS, OR UNTIL APRIL 7, 2025 TO ANSWER OR FURTHER PLEAD AND REQUEST FOR ALL REMAINING DEADLINES IN THE DECEMBER 5, 2024, SECOND AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER BE EXTENDED 60 DAYS
  78. REDLINE ENERGY LLCS OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
  79. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO HANOVER'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DAMAGES
  80. PLAINTIFF PROGRESSIVE WELL SERVICE'S INC RESPONSE TO HANOVER'S MOTION TO STRIKE GENERIC LISTING OF WITNESSES & EXHIBIT LIST FILED FEBRUARY 14, 2025
  81. MOTION OF DEFENDANT HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY TO COMPEL INSPECTION
  82. NOTICE OF HEARING
  83. CM - PER BAILIFF, RESET TO 5/1/25 AT 9:00 FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. HC
  84. PLAINTIFF PROGRESSIVE WELL SERVICE'S INC RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO HANOVER'S MOTION TO COMPEL INSPECTION
  85. HANOVER'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE GENERIC LISTINGS OF WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS FROM PLAINTIFF'S FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  86. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY'S REPLY ON ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DAMAGES
  87. HANOVER'S REPLY ON MOTION TO COMPEL INSPECTION
  88. COURT REPORTER FEE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more