Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-15
Type Cc Appl To Enf Mechanics Lien
Docket 34 entries
Disposition disposed

Parties

Plaintiff Huebert Builders, Inc.|Jones, Clark L|Christofferson, Philip James
Defendant Stephens College|Nickel, Robert Andrew
Photo of Hon. Devine Joshua Calvin

Judge

Hon. Devine Joshua Calvin

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. rder to Consolidate By consent, Plaintiff Tarlton Corporation?s Motion to Consolidate is GRANTED. Accordingly, this case (Case No. 24BA-CV01651) is hereby consolidated into Case No. 24BA-CV01480. Going forward, all claims in both cases shall be prosecuted under Case No. 24BA-CV01480. JCD/IV (ad)
  4. otion to Consolidate Motion to Consolidate By Consent; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: PHILIP JAMES CHRISTOFFERSON
  6. ert Serv of Interrog Filed Certificate of Service; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROBERT ANDREW NICKEL On Behalf Of: STEPHENS COLLEGE
  8. nswer Filed Answer to Counterclaim; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  10. rder Without objection from Defendant, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave filed 6-5-24 is GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant is granted leave of up to and including 6-20-24 to answer or otherwise respond to Defendant's Counterclaim. JCD/IV (ad)
  12. roposed Order Filed Proposed Order; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  13. ot for Leave to File Out/Time Motion for Leave to File Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Counterclaim out of Time; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  14. roposed Order Filed Proposed Order; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  15. rder for Change of Judge Case is reassigned to Div 4. JHJ/I (rl)
  16. rd Transfer P/Judge for Assn Defendant's application for change of judge granted. Cause to presiding judge for reassignment. RJH/II (rl)
  17. rder for Change of Judge Case is reassigned to Div 4. JHJ/I (rl)
  18. otion for Change of Judge Defendants Application for Change of Judge; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. On Behalf Of: STEPHENS COLLEGE
  19. nswer Filed Defendant Stephens Colleges Answer and Counterclaim to Plaintiffs Petition; Exhibit A; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JOHN MATTHEW REYNOLDS On Behalf Of: STEPHENS COLLEGE
  20. ntry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JOHN MATTHEW REYNOLDS On Behalf Of: STEPHENS COLLEGE
  21. ntry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROBERT ANDREW NICKEL On Behalf Of: STEPHENS COLLEGE
  22. ntry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JOHN MATTHEW REYNOLDS On Behalf Of: STEPHENS COLLEGE
  23. orporation Served Document ID - 24-SMCC-417; Served To - STEPHENS COLLEGE; Served Date - 05/07/2024; Served Time - 14:49:00; Service Type - SP; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -served to Dr. Diane Lynch
  24. otice of Service Return Summons. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  25. orporation Served Document ID - 24-SMCC-417; Served To - STEPHENS COLLEGE; Served Date - 05/07/2024; Served Time - 14:49:00; Service Type - SP; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -served to Dr. Diane Lynch
  26. ummons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 24-SMCC-417, for STEPHENS COLLEGE Attorneys are to print two copies of summons and issue for service.
  27. rder - Special Process Server
  28. rder Parties are ordered to submit joint proposed scheduling order within 30 days of the date that an answer or pleading in response to the petition is filed. In addition to all customary deadlines, the scheduling order shall provide that jury instructions shall be filed two weeks before the date of the pretrial conference. RJH/II rl
  29. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: CLARK L JONES
  30. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: CLARK L JONES
  31. roposed Order Filed Order for Appointment of Special Process Server. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  32. otion Special Process Server Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  33. roposed Order Filed Order for Appointment of Special Process Server. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.
  34. otion Special Process Server Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server. Filed By: CLARK L JONES On Behalf Of: HUEBERT BUILDERS, INC.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more