Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-13
Status ACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Joseph Marquez
Photo of Hon. NANCY MARGARET RUSSO

Judge

Hon. NANCY MARGARET RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. UMS COMPLAINT(56888258) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOSEPH MARQUEZ 9620 EUREKA PKWY PARMA HEIGHTS, OH 44130 ANSWER DATE: 06/03/2025
  2. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  3. RIT FEE
  4. N THE EVENT DEFENDANT FAILS TO TIMELY ANSWER, MOTION FOR DEFAULT DUE BY 4PM ON 06/09/2025 AND PT/CMC WILL BE RESET TO DEFAULT HEARING. FAILURE OF PLAINTIF TO TIMELY SEND SERVIE/FILE MOTION/NOTIFY DEFENDANT/APPEAR WILL RESULT IN DWOP NOTICE ISSUED
  5. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR ALIAS SERVICE
  6. T/CMC OF 5/6/25 IS CANCELLED. PLAINTIFF ORDERED TO ISSUE REGULAR MAIL SERVICE BY 4PM ON 5/5/25. PT/CMC RESET TO 6/24/25 AT 1PM DEFENDANTS ANSWER DUE BY 6/5/25. IN THE EVENT DEFENDANT FAILS TO TIMELY ANSWER, MOTION FOR DEFAULT DUE BY 4PM ON 5/9/25 AND PT/CMC WILL BE RESET TO DEFAULT HEARING. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO TIMELY SEND SERVICE/FILE MOTION/NOTIFY DEFENDANT/APPEAR WILL RESULT IN DWOP. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. EFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/24/2025 AT 01:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  8. MC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 05/06/2025 AT 01:45 PM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 06/24/2025 AT 01:00 PM (Notice Sent).
  9. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 05/06/2025 AT 01:45 PM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: NANCY MARGARET RUSSO (326) REASON: UNKNOWN (notice sent).
  10. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 05/06/2025 AT 01:45 PM THIS CASE IS SET FOR A PRETRIAL/CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT. FAILURE OF ANY PARTY'S COUNSEL OR PRO SE PARTY TO APPEAR AT ANY SCHEDULED EVENT DURING THE PENDENCY OF THIS CASE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, THE APPROPRIATE MOTION MUST BE FILED NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT, AND THE COURT PROVIDED WITH A COURTESY COPY ON THE DATE OF FILING. DO NOT CALL THE COURT TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO REQUESTS NOT MADE IN WRITING, DOCKETED AND WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME ABOVE, ABSENT AN EMERGENCY. THE COURT REQUIRES A COURTESY COPY OF ALL PLEADINGS IN EXCESS OF 5 PAGES, TO BE MAILED OR HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. E-FILING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COURTESY COPY. PLEADINGS OF 5 PAGES OR LESS THAT ARE E-FILED DO NOT NEED TO BE DELIVERED TO THE COURT. PARTIES WISHING TO PERFECT SERVICE BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER IN ANY GIVEN CASE MUST FIRST FILE A SEPARATE MOTION TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER DIRECTLY WITH JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO BEFORE ATTEMPTING SERVICE BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER MAY RESULT IN THE COURT STRIKING SUCH SERVICE ATTEMPTS. MOTIONS TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVERS MUST HAVE A PROPOSED ORDER ATTACHED TO THE MOTION FOR THE COURT'S REVIEW AND SIGNATURE. (THE PROPOSED ORDER MAY ALSO BE SENT ADDITIONALLY AS A WORD DOCUMENT). THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD BY PHONE UNLESS OTHERWISE DOCKETED. THE PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO CALL THE CONFERENCE LINE AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. 1-978-990-5000 - ACCESS CODE 728961#. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY PORTION OF THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS, INCLUDING THIS ORDER, MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, JUDGMENT OR OTHER SANCTIONS. PARTIES ARE TO ABIDE BY THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS CONTAINED HEREIN AND LOCATED AT: HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-NANCY-MARGARET-RUSSO NOTICE ISSUED
  11. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56390428 RETURNED 4/8/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MARQUEZ/JOSEPH/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. OCKET HAS BEEN STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT (DOCKET 193490582 03/17/2025 SR)
  13. PECIAL PROCESS SERVICE SENT PRIOR TO THE FILING OF THE MOTION, A RULING FROM THE COURT AND COURT ORDER IS STRICKEN. COUNSEL ADVISED THAT SERVICE OBTAINED FROM THIS SPECIAL PROCESS SERVICE WILL BE STRICKEN. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. OTION TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. MOTION TO APPOINT PROCESS SERVER
  15. UMS COMPLAINT(56390428) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOSEPH MARQUEZ 9620 EUREKA PKWY PARMA HEIGHTS, OH 44130
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. RIT FEE
  18. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. RIT FEE
  20. UDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  21. EGAL RESEARCH
  22. EGAL NEWS
  23. EGAL AID
  24. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  25. OMPUTER FEE
  26. LERK'S FEE
  27. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MICHELLE L. HATFIELD

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more