Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-20
Status OPEN
Type Negligence Premises Liability Residential
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Carol Smith
Defendant Ashley Faas
Photo of Hon. JIROTKA, GEORGE M

Judge

Hon. JIROTKA, GEORGE M

Pinellas County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS(ES) Party: SMITH, CAROL
  2. OTICE OF CANCELLATION
  3. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  4. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  5. RDER GRANTING
  6. OTICE OF HEARING
  7. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  8. UBPOENA RETURN OF SERVICE -SERVED
  9. UBPOENA RETURN OF SERVICE -SERVED
  10. UBPOENA RETURN OF SERVICE -SERVED
  11. UBPOENA RETURN OF SERVICE -SERVED
  12. UBPOENA RETURN OF SERVICE -SERVED
  13. UBPOENA RETURN OF SERVICE -SERVED
  14. ERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION
  15. OTION TO WITHDRAW
  16. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  17. TANDING ORDER ASSIGNING GENERAL CIVIL CASE TRACK
  18. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  19. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  20. ESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS(ES) Party: FAAS, ASHLEY
  21. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: FAAS, ASHLEY
  22. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  23. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  24. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  25. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  26. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: FAAS, ASHLEY
  27. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: FAAS, ASHLEY
  28. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: FAAS, ASHLEY
  29. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: FAAS, ASHLEY
  30. ESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS(ES)
  31. OMPLAINT WITH DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.