Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-04
Type Money Judgment
Docket 35 entries
Disposition judgment in favor of plaintiff
Photo of Hon. Reilly Maxey P

Judge

Hon. Reilly Maxey P

Okfuskee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. ISSUE AFFIDAVIT CLAIM/ORDER
  2. (IN EXCESS OF $5001.00 TO $10,000.00)
  3. LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT
  4. DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT
  5. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. STATE JUDICIAL REV FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  9. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  10. 10% CASA, COJC, CHS TO REVOLVING FUND
  11. 15% CASA, COJC, CHS TO DISTRICT COURT REV FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SHERIFF SERVICE - CIVIL
  14. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  15. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  16. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  17. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  18. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  19. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  20. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  21. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  22. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  23. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  24. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  25. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  26. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  27. ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED
  28. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  29. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  30. MINUTE ORDER - PLAINTIFF JESSE E. MOORE- PRO SE. DEF DOES NOT APPEAR. CAUSE COMES ON FOR PETITION FOR MONEY JUDGEMENT. PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN PERSON, PRO SE. DEF HAS NOT BEEN SERVED AND DOES NOT APPEAR. THE COURT AUTHORIZES AN ALIAS SUMMONS UPON PAYMENT OF THE FEE BY PLAINTIFF. PLAINTIFF IS RECOGNIZED BACK TO 11-12-24 AT 9:30AM.
  31. SUMMONS RETURNED - TAMEEKA HOLIDAY- NOT SERVED
  32. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM ASSESSMENT
  33. RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED - TEMEEKA HOLIDAY - ALIAS SUMMONS - HOLIDAY INN PADEN
  34. MINUTE ORDER - APPEARANCES PLAINTIFF JESSE E. MOORE-PRO SE AND DEF TAMEEKA HOLIDAY-PRO SE. CAUSE COMES ON FOR PETITION FOR MONEY JUDGEMENT. PLAINTIFF AND DEF EACG APPEAR IN PERSON, PRO SE. DEF WAS ADVISED OF HER RIGHTS AND REQUESTS A HEARING. THE COURT SETS NON-JURY TRIAL FOR 11-19-24 AT 11AM. PARTIES ARE RECOGNIZED BACK TO THAT DATE AND TIME.
  35. MINUTE ORDER - APPEARANCE PLAINTIFF JESSE E. MOORE- PRO SE AND DEF TAMEEKA HOLIDAY- PRO SE. CAUSE COMES ON FOR MONEY JUDGMENT. PLAINTIFF AND DEF EACH APPEAR IN PERSON, PRO SE. EACH PARTY WAS SWORN AND TESTIMONY GIVEN. THE COURT TAKES INTO EVIDENCE PLAINTIFF EXHIBIT NOS. 1 THROUGH 5 AS FOLLOWS, EACH OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO: EXHIBIT 1 - INVOICES AND WORK ORDERS (7PAGES); EXHIBIT 2- STATEMENT OF SYDNEY FORTON (2PAGES); EXHIBIT 3 - STATEMENT OF ARLAN JISKOOT (2PAGES); EXHIBIT 4 - STATEMENT OF JOEL MCGIRT (3PAGES); AND EXHIBIT 5 - STATEMENT OF ROGER ALLISON (4PAGES). UPON REVIEWING THE FILE AND HEARING ORAL TESTIMONY, THE COURT GRANTS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,779.14 ($3,500 JUDGMENT + $219.40 FILINF FEE + $50 PROCESS SERVER + ALIAS SUMMONS = $3,779.14 TOTAL).

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more