Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-25
Status Pending
Type 22 Cv Auto Civil Unlimited
Docket 65 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Arribillago Duran, Lisa|Duran, Arria|Duran, Daven|Duran, Darrell E.
Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.|Cardenas, Zenia|Cross duran , Darrell E.
Photo of Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Judge

Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment Appointing Darrell E. Duran as Guardian ad Litem for Daven Duran, a minor.
  2. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment Appointing Darrell E. Duran as Guardian ad Litem for Arria Duran, a minor.
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 10/21/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: J
  4. Served 07/09/20243:47 PM Served 07/18/20242:41 PM
  5. Comment as to Zenia Cardenas, by substituted service
  6. Comment Def/X-Comp's Demand for Jury Trial
  7. Comment Notice of Consent to Electronic Service and Notice of Electronic Service Address
  8. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 07/25/2024
  9. Comment as to Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. via sub service
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Please refile Proof of Service without a cover page.
  11. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment "Attorney for(name):" is incomplete. Please specify which party you are representing. The Courts correct address for Civil is 1215 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301
  12. Comment On Cross-Complaint as to Aaron Huseby, by personal service
  13. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Review/correct Plaintiff's names. Please ensure caption conforms exact.
  14. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  15. Comment Notice Of Motion; Motion To Compel Defendant Cardenas Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Set One And Requests For Production, Set One; Request For Sanctions; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of Tanya D. Alsheikh
  16. Comment Separate Statement Of Items In Dispute In Support Of Plaintiffs Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Set One And Request For Production, Set One
  17. Comment Motion to Compel defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc s further responses to form interrogatories
  18. Comment Separate Statement Of Items In Dispute In Support Of Plaintiffs Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Set One And Request For Production, Set One
  19. Comment 1990 N. California Blvd, Suite 200 Walnut Creek CA 94596
  20. Comment for Plaintiffs
  21. Comment for Plaintiffs
  22. Comment Defendant Zenia Cardenas Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories And Requests For Production Of Documents, Set One, And Request For Sanctions; Request For Sanctions Against Plaintiffs And Plaintiffs Counsel; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration Of Shirley Carpenter Bridwell In Support Thereof
  23. Comment Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. S Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories And Requests For Production Of Documents, Set One, And Request For Sanctions; Request For Sanctions Against Plaintiffs And Plaintiffs Counsel; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration Of Shirley Carpenter Bridwell In Support Thereof
  24. Comment Reply to Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion to compel further responses to Form interrogatories, set one and Request for Production, set one
  25. Comment Reply to Defendant Zenia Cardenas' Opposition to Motion to Compel further responses to form interrogatories, set one and Request for Production, set one
  26. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Case Management Conference 01/06/2025 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  27. View Document Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses 01/07/2025 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Multiple Motions Held Comment 11/22 Motion to Compel defendant Cardenas further responses to form interrogatories
  28. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Multiple Motions-Similar Issues Comment 11/22 Motion To Compel Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. s Further Responses
  29. Comment for Cross-Defendant, Aaron Huseby
  30. Comment Letter to Court Re Proposed Orders on Motions to Compel Heard 1/7/25
  31. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.'s Further Responses to Discovery
  32. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Cardenas' Further Responses to Discovery
  33. Comment as to the Cross-Defendant Aaron Huseby, ONLY
  34. Comment Notice of Motion; Motion to Compel Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.'s Further Responses to Request for Production, Set Two, and a Privilege Log; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Sanctions; Declaration of Tanya D. Alsheikh
  35. Comment Separate Statement of Items in Dispute in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Further Responses Request for Production, Set Two
  36. Comment Notice of Motion; Motion to Compel Defendant Zenia Cardenas' Further Responses to Request for Production, Set Two, and a Privilege Log; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Sanctions; Declaration of Tanya D. Alsheikh
  37. Comment Separate Statement of Items in Dispute in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production, Set Two
  38. Comment Defendant Zenia Cardenass opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel further responses to request for production, set two, and a privilege log; memorandum of points and authorities; declaration of Tabitha Flood in support
  39. Comment Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.s opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel further responses to request for production, set two, and a privilege log; memorandum of points and authorities; declaration of Tabitha Flood in support
  40. Comment Defendant Zenia Cardenas's separate statement in opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel further responses to request for production, set two, and a privilege log
  41. Comment Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.s separate statement in opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel further responses to request for production, set two, and a privilege log
  42. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Replies to Oppositions (x2). REASON: Hearing date information is incorrect. The motion is set for April 4, 2025.
  43. Comment Reply to Defendant, Zenia Cardenas' Opposition to Motion to Compel Further Response and/or a Privilege Log to Requests for Production, Set Two
  44. Comment Reply to Defendant, Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion to Compel Further Response and/or a Privilege Log to Requests for Production, Set Two
  45. View Document Motion to Compel 04/04/2025 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 3/5 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.'s Further Responses to Request for Production
  46. View Document Motion to Compel 04/04/2025 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 3/5 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant Zenia Cardenas' Further Responses to Request for Production
  47. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment Order on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendants Cardenas and Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.'s Further Responses to Request for Production, Set Two, and/or a Privilege Log
  48. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 10:00 AM Comment FCMC 4/10/26, JT 4/23/26, T/E; 7 DAYS
  49. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 02:30 PM Comment jury trial set 04/13/2026 jury for all parties (confirm payment of fees by Cross-Defendant Aaron Huseby) t/e: 7 days
  50. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 09:30 AM Comment jury for all parties (confirm payment of fees by Cross-Defendant Aaron Huseby) t/e: 7 days

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more