Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-13
Type Fc Dissolution W/o Children
Docket 21 entries
Disposition consent judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Caaness, Michael Scott
Defendant Cavaness, Angelia Raye
Photo of Hon. Stacey, Brenda

Judge

Hon. Stacey, Brenda

Jefferson County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  2. ertificate of Mailing CERTIFIED COPIES MAILED TO PARTIES
  3. udge/Clerk - Note ASSIGNED TO BOOKKEEPING AND CHILD SUPPORT
  4. ffidavit Filed JOINT AFFIDAVIT
  5. udgment on Dissolution ***JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION***. NO MAINTENANCE ORDERED (SEE JUDGMENT) SO ORDERED: THE HONORABLE JUDGE BRENDA STACEY, CIRCUIT DIVISION FOUR (NON-MONETARY JUDGMENT AGAINST BOTH PARTIES)
  6. udgment on Dissolution ***JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION***. NO MAINTENANCE ORDERED (SEE JUDGMENT) SO ORDERED: THE HONORABLE JUDGE BRENDA STACEY, CIRCUIT DIVISION FOUR (NON-MONETARY JUDGMENT AGAINST BOTH PARTIES)
  7. onsent Judgment
  8. rder CAUSE CALLED FOR PTC. PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT APPEAR, PRO SE. THE PARTIES ANNOUNCE THAT THERE ARE NO DISPUTES. AND REQUEST FINAL JUDGMENT ENTER ON THIS DATE. COURT REVIEWS COURT FILE, AND FINDS ALL NECESSARY FILINGS ARE SATISFIED. PARTIES ARE PROVIDED THE "JOINT AFFIDAVIT FOR JUDGMENT" WHICH THEY COMPLETED AND BEING PLACED UNDER OATH, SIGN THE AFFIDAVIT. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT PARTIES REQUEST TO VACATE PTC AND PROCEED WITH DISSOLUTION IS GRANTED SO ORDERED: BRENDA STACEY, CIRCUIT JUDGE DIV. FOUR
  9. re-Trial Conference Held Associated Entries: 08/14/2024 - Pre-trial Conference Scheduled Scheduled For: 10/22/2024; 10:30 AM; BRENDA STACEY; Jefferson
  10. re-trial Conference Scheduled Associated Entries: 10/22/2024 - Pre-Trial Conference Held Scheduled For: 10/22/2024; 10:30 AM; BRENDA STACEY; Jefferson
  11. otice of Court Hearing Sent MAILED TO BOTH PARTIES
  12. nswer Filed ANSWERS FILED- RESPONDENT Filed By: ANGELIA RAYE CAVANESS
  13. aiver of Service WAIVER OF SERVICE AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Filed By: ANGELIA RAYE CAVANESS
  14. onfid Dom Rel Info File Sheet CONFIDENTIAL FILING SHEET Filed By: MICHAEL SCOTT CAVANESS
  15. omp-Litigant Awareness Filed LITIGANT AWARENESS- RESPONDENT Filed By: ANGELIA RAYE CAVANESS
  16. omp-Litigant Awareness Filed LITIGANT AWARENESS- PETITIONER Filed By: MICHAEL SCOTT CAVANESS
  17. otice of Hearing Filed BLANK NOTICE OF HEARING Filed By: MICHAEL SCOTT CAVANESS
  18. ncome & Expense Stmnt Filed STATEMENT OF INCOME Filed By: MICHAEL SCOTT CAVANESS
  19. roperty Statement Filed STATEMENT OF PROPERTY Filed By: MICHAEL SCOTT CAVANESS
  20. roposed Judmt/Dec Dis Filed PROPOSED JUDGMENT Filed By: MICHAEL SCOTT CAVANESS
  21. ertificate of Dissolution CERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION Filed By: MICHAEL SCOTT CAVANESS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more