Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-17
Type Ac Rent And Possession
Docket 51 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Northbrook Gardens Apartments Company, L.p.|Kinkade, Kerry J
Defendant Sprott, Andre B. Jr|Doe, John/jane
Photo of Hon. Flook Timothy Jon

Judge

Hon. Flook Timothy Jon

Clay County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. nsrs to Interrogatories Filed Garnishment/Execution Number 23-GARN-738
  4. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 23-GARN-738; Served To - US BANK; Server - SO CLAY COUNTY-LIBERTY; Served Date - 01-MAR-23; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served; Service Text - SERVED TO ANASTASIA HUMPHREYS
  6. arnishment Paid to Attorney
  7. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 23-GARN-738 for ANDRE B. SPROTT; Clay CO proceeds to attorney jet; returnable date: 24-MAR-2023; Garnishee: US BANK
  9. equest for Execution/Garnish Northbrook Gardens vs. Sprott, Andre BANK GMENT. GARNISHMENT REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT YET PROCESSED jet Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE On Behalf Of: NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS COMPANY, L.P., NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS
  11. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 22-GARN-3217; Served To - US BANK; Server - SO CLAY COUNTY-LIBERTY; Served Date - 03-OCT-22; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served; Service Text - SERVED TO JOHN BUTLER
  13. arnishment Paid to Attorney
  14. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 22-GARN-3217 for ANDRE B. SPROTT; Clay CO proceeds to attorney jet; returnable date: 27-OCT-2022; Garnishee: US BANK
  16. equest for Execution/Garnish Northbrook Gardens vs. Sprott, Andre BANK GMENT. GARNISHMENT REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT YET PROCESSED jet Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE On Behalf Of: NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS COMPANY, L.P., NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS
  18. udge Assigned
  20. ppeal Dismissed
  21. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 22-GARN-2556; Served To - ; Server - SO CLAY COUNTY-LIBERTY; Served Date - 12-AUG-22; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Notice to Vacate Served; Service Text - POSTED ON DOOR
  22. otion Hearing Held PLAINTIFF BY ATTY. DEFENDANT FTA. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS OVERRULED. LA/aes Associated Entries: 08/17/2022 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 08/29/2022; 2:00 PM; TIMOTHY JON FLOOK; Clay
  23. uggestions in Opposition Suggestions in Opposition to Defendants Motion. Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE On Behalf Of: NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS COMPANY, L.P.
  24. otice Noitce mailed out. aes
  25. otion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/29/2022 - Motion Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 08/29/2022; 2:00 PM; TIMOTHY JON FLOOK; Clay
  26. otion to Set Aside Filed By: ANDRE B. SPROTT JR
  27. orrespondence Filed Filed By: ANDRE B. SPROTT JR
  28. ckn Notice of Appeal Filed
  29. ppeal Costs Taxed NOTICE OF APPEAL EMAILED TO MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS- WESTERN DISTRICT AND A CERTIFIED COPY MAILED TO NORTH BROOK GARDENS APARTMENT COMPANY
  30. emand for Del of Possession This is garnishment 22-GARN-2556 for ANDRE B. SPROTT; Clay CO 5 days jet also John Doe/Jane Doe; returnable date:5 DAYS
  31. rit Requested Northbrook Gardens vs. Sprott, Andre RESTITUTION. Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE On Behalf Of: NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS COMPANY, L.P., NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS
  32. otice
  33. udgment Entered POSSESSION PLUS INTEREST AND COST $33.50 GC. Filed By: TIMOTHY JON FLOOK
  34. efault Judgment Default Judgment: Plaintiff appears by counsel, Defendant(s) appear(s) not. Plaintiff moves for default judgment. The Court finds that Defendant(s) is/are in default, therefore, the fact allegations within Plaintiff's Petitioner are deemed admitted. The Court finds for Plaintiff on the submitted claim(s) as pled in the Petition. Findings and Judgment all as per Judgment hereby executed and filed. Plaintiff shall submit proposed form of Judgment. SO ORDERED. TJF/lmg Associated Entries: 07/18/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Associated Entries: 07/18/2022 - Bench Trial Scheduled Scheduled For: 07/27/2022; 1:45 PM; TIMOTHY JON FLOOK; Clay
  35. ench Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/27/2022 - Default Judgment + Scheduled For: 07/27/2022; 1:45 PM; TIMOTHY JON FLOOK; Clay
  36. earing Continued/Rescheduled Plaintiff appears by Attorney. Defendant Sprott appears in person. Other defendants not. Trial set for 1:45 p.m. July 27, 2022. TJF/aes Associated Entries: 06/21/2022 - Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/27/2022 - Default Judgment + Hearing Continued From: 07/18/2022; 1:30 PM Hearing
  37. earing/Trial Cancelled Associated Entries: 06/21/2022 - Dismissal Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 10/17/2022; 1:35 PM; TIMOTHY JON FLOOK; Clay
  38. osted - Residence Document ID - 22-SM51-1348; Served To - DOE, JOHN/JANE; Server - ; Served Date - 01-JUL-22; Served Time - 09:28:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Posted
  39. osted - Residence Document ID - 22-SM51-1347; Served To - SPROTT, ANDRE B.; Server - ; Served Date - 25-JUN-22; Served Time - 10:33:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Posted
  40. otice of Service return of service for JOhn/Jane Doe, posted and mailed Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE On Behalf Of: NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS COMPANY, L.P., NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS
  41. otice of Service return of service for Andre Sprott jr, posted and mailed Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE
  42. ummons Issued-Landlord/Tenant Document ID: 22-SM51-1348, for DOE, JOHN/JANE.
  43. ummons Issued-Landlord/Tenant Document ID: 22-SM51-1347, for SPROTT, ANDRE B..
  44. rder to Post Summons Associated Entries: 06/17/2022 - Motion to Post Summons +
  45. rder - Special Process Server Associated Entries: 06/17/2022 - Motion Special Process Server +
  46. ismissal Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/13/2022 - Hearing/Trial Cancelled Scheduled For: 10/17/2022; 1:35 PM; TIMOTHY JON FLOOK; Clay
  47. earing Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/18/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 07/18/2022; 1:30 PM; TIMOTHY JON FLOOK; Clay
  48. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE
  49. otion Special Process Server MO SPS. Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE On Behalf Of: NORTHBROOK GARDENS APARTMENTS COMPANY, L.P. Associated Entries: 06/21/2022 - Order - Special Process Server
  50. otion to Post Summons MO POST. Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE Associated Entries: 06/21/2022 - Order to Post Summons
  51. et Filed in Associate Ct PETITION. Filed By: KERRY J KINKADE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more