Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alameda

Court

Alameda

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-10
Type Civil Harassment
Docket 16 entries
Disposition pending

Parties

Plaintiff Remar Stanton
Defendant Philip Chart
Photo of Hon. Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse / Dept 105 Hon. Joscelyn Jones

Judge

Hon. Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse / Dept 105 Hon. Joscelyn Jones

Alameda County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. H-100 Request for Civil Harassment Restraining Order Filed by: Remar Stanton (Petitioner) As to: Philip Chart (Respondent)
  2. H-109 Notice of Court Hearing (Civil Harassment) Received from: Remar Stanton (Petitioner) As to: Philip Chart (Respondent)
  3. H-110 Temporary Restraining Order (Civil Harassment) Received from: Remar Stanton (Petitioner) As to: Philip Chart (Respondent)
  4. onfidential CLETS Information Received from: Remar Stanton (Petitioner) As to: Philip Chart (Respondent)
  5. ivil Harassment Restraining Order Hearing scheduled for 04/02/2025 at 09:00 AM in Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse at Department 105
  6. pdated -- CH-110 Temporary Restraining Order (Civil Harassment): Status Date changed from 03/11/2025 to 03/11/2025 Result: Granted in Part Status changed from Pending in WQ to Issued and Filed
  7. ase assigned to Hon. Brian Caruth in Department 105 Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse
  8. H-110 Temporary Restraining Order (Civil Harassment) Pending in WQ by:
  9. mended CH-110 Temporary Restraining Order (Civil Harassment) Issued and Filed by: Clerk
  10. H-250 Proof of Service of Response By Mail (Civil Harassment) Filed by: Remar Stanton (Petitioner) As to: Philip Chart (Respondent)
  11. ffidavit of Unsuccessful Service Filed by: Remar Stanton (Petitioner)
  12. H-116 Order on Request to Continue Hearing Issued and Filed by: Clerk
  13. ivil Harassment Restraining Order Hearing scheduled for 04/23/2025 at 09:00 AM in Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse at Department 105
  14. ertificate of Mailing for [CH-116 Order on Request to Continue Hearing] Issued and Filed by: Clerk
  15. inute Order (Civil Harassment Restraining Order Hearing filed by Remar Sta...)
  16. ivil Harassment Restraining Order Hearing scheduled for 04/02/2025 at 09:00 AM in Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse at Department 105 Held - Continued was rescheduled to 04/23/2025 09:00 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more