Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-08
Type Partition
Docket 145 entries
Disposition settlement

Parties

Plaintiff Lancaster, Rebecca
Defendant Snoderly, Lynn
Photo of Hon. CHRISTINE CROCE

Judge

Hon. CHRISTINE CROCE

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ORIGINAL ACTION COST PAID IN FULL.
  2. **CASE COSTED THRU 1/11/24 FOR ORIGINAL COST. BILLED D2, ATTY VOGT $121.87. BILLED D3 ATTY KRUPKO $121.87. SD
  3. Regular Mail Service - Mailed SHAWN ANETTE WILSON
  4. Regular Mail Service - Mailed REBECCA LANCASTER
  5. Regular Mail Service - Mailed PAUL R. MARCINKOSKI
  6. Regular Mail Service - Mailed MEGAN E VOGT
  7. Regular Mail Service - Mailed MARK H LUDWIG
  8. Regular Mail Service - Mailed LYNN SNODERLY
  9. Regular Mail Service - Mailed JO ANN MARCINKOSKI
  10. Regular Mail Service - Mailed JAMIE M. HAREN
  11. Regular Mail Service - Mailed ELIZABETH SNODERLY
  12. Regular Mail Service - Mailed DANIEL P KRUPKO
  13. Regular Mail Service - Mailed CLAY K KELLER
  14. Regular Mail Service - Mailed CATHERINE SNODERLY
  15. NOTICE ISSUED WILSON, SHAWN ANETTE
  16. NOTICE ISSUED LANCASTER, REBECCA
  17. NOTICE ISSUED MARCINKOSKI, PAUL R.
  18. NOTICE ISSUED VOGT, MEGAN E
  19. NOTICE ISSUED LUDWIG, MARK H
  20. NOTICE ISSUED SNODERLY, LYNN
  21. NOTICE ISSUED MARCINKOSKI, JO ANN
  22. NOTICE ISSUED HAREN, JAMIE M.
  23. NOTICE ISSUED SNODERLY, ELIZABETH
  24. NOTICE ISSUED KRUPKO, DANIEL P
  25. NOTICE ISSUED KELLER, CLAY K
  26. NOTICE ISSUED SNODERLY, CATHERINE
  27. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS ASSERTED IN THIS ACTION. PARTIES AGREE THAT THIS COURT SHALL RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THEIR SETTLEMENT. PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS LYNN SNODERLY, ELIZABETH SNODERLY AND CATHERINE DOBYAN ARE TO SPLIT THE COURT COSTS IN HALF. CC
  28. MOTION TO APPEAR VIA ZOOM
  29. PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM
  30. Certified Mail Service - Served CLAY K KELLER
  31. A DISMISSAL ENTRY IS TO BE FILED WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2023. IN THE EVENT A DISMISSAL ENTRY IS NOT FILED HEREIN WITHIN THAT TIME PERIOD, THE PARTITION HEARING IS RESCHEDULED TO NOVEMBER 21, 2023 AT 9:00 A.M. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DISMISSED. CC
  32. NOTIFICATION OF FAILURE TO OBTAIN SERVICE LYNN SNODERLY
  33. Certified Mail Service - Unclaimed LYNN SNODERLY
  34. DEFENDANT LYNN SNODERLY’S MOTION TO JOIN AND APPOINT
  35. MOTION FOR HEARING
  36. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT, LYNN SNODERLY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  37. DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO ORDER/MOTION TO SET ASIDE MOTION IS OVERRULED. CC
  38. DEFENDANT LYNN SNODERLY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. CC
  39. THE DEFENDANT LYNN SNODERLY’S MOTION TO CONTINUE IS DENIED. THIS MATTER REMAINS SCHEDULED FOR HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2023, AT 9:00 A.M. CC
  40. NOTICE ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail KELLER, CLAY K
  41. COUNTERCLAIM FILED
  42. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE
  43. THI8S MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT UPON THE NOTICE OF SUGGESTION OF DEATH FILED HEREIN ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2023, NOTING THAT DEFENDANT PAUL MARCINKOSKI PASSED AWAY ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 28, 2018. NO MORE THAN 90 DAYS AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2023, PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION SEEKING SUBSTITUTION PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 25) A. CC
  44. NOTICE OF SUGGESTION OF DEATH
  45. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  46. DEFENDANT, CATHERINE C. SNODERLY AKA CATHERINE DOBYAN ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  47. DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT FOR OBJECTIONS
  48. LYNN SNODERLY'S MOTION TO CONTINUE PARTITION HEARING AND TO CLARIFY ITS SCOPE
  49. LYNN SNODERLY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  50. LYNN SNODERLY'S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  51. ANSWER OF JO ANN MARCINKOSKI TRUSTEE OF THE MARCINKOSKI FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT
  52. LYNN SNODERLY'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST INTERROGATORY TO PLAINTIFF
  53. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS - LENA DUNCAN, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER (DOCUMENT IN SAFE ROOM)
  54. DISCOVERY RESPONSES
  55. NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER THE COURT UPON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION SEEKING ACCESS TO THE JOINTLY OWNED PROPERTIES. UNOCCUPIED PREMISES – NO LATER THAN AUGUST 25, 2023, OCCUPIED PREMISES – NO LATER THAN AUGUST 25, 2023, VACANT LAND – PLAINTIFF DOES NOT MENTION REQUIRING ANY ASSISTANCE TO VIEW THE VACANT LAND PARCEL(S). IN ANY CASE, IN VIEWING ALL OF THE PROPERTIES, PLAINTIFF MAY BE ACCOMPANIED BY COUNSEL AND/OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL(S). CC
  56. THE COURT HAS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED THAT THE OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE APPLY TO THIS MATTER. ALL DISCOVERY SHALL PROCEED AS SET FORTH IN THOSE RULES. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS AS SET FORTH THEREIN. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE APPLY HEREIN. CC
  57. THE MOTION IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT CATHERINE DOBYAN MAY APPEAR AT THE HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 BY VIDEO CONFERENCE. HER COUNSEL SHALL APPEAR AT THE HEARING IN PERSON. CC
  58. DEFENDANT’S MOTION IS DENIED. THE OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE APPLY TO THIS MATTER. DEFENDANT’S SUGGESTION IN OTHER FILINGS THAT THE OHIO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IN PART OR IN WHOLE, SHOULD APPLY TO THIS MATTER IS MISGUIDED AND INAPPROPRIATE. CC
  59. THE COURT DECLINES TO REQUIRE ANY PARTY TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS POSED IN DEFENDANT’S REQUEST, AS SUBMITTED IN THAT FORMAT. THE MOTION IS DENIED. CC
  60. IN ANY CASE, IN VIEWING ALL OF THE PROPERTIES, PLAINTIFF MAY BE ACCOMPANIED BY COUNSEL AND/OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL(S). NO LATER THAN AUGUST 25, 2023, DEFENDANTS SHALL PROVIDE TO PLAINTIFF, THROUGH COUNSEL, KEYS TO THE UNOCCUPIED PREMISES NO LATER THAN AUGUST 25, 2023, DEFENDANTS SHALL PROVIDE TO PLAINTIFF, THROUGH COUNSEL, A LIST OF TENANT NAMES AND CONTACT INFORMATION. CC
  61. AMENDED COMPLAINT
  62. EXHIBITS A-F
  63. EXHIBIT G PAGES 1-12
  64. EX G PGS 13-20
  65. EX G PGS 21-27
  66. PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR AN ORDER SEEKING ACCESS TO JOINTLY OWNED PROPERTIES
  67. EXHIBIT A
  68. EXHIBIT B
  69. EXHIBIT C
  70. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  71. OBJECTION AND MOTION RE MAGIS ORDER
  72. REPONSE TO MOTION TO COOPERATE INSPECT
  73. REQUEST AND MOTION FOR ANSWER
  74. DEFENDANT LYNN SNODERLY ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
  75. INITIAL REPLY SUPPORT PRETRIAL DOCUMENTS
  76. SECOND NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENT AUTHORITIES
  77. INTIAL REPLY SUPPORT NO CVL RULES
  78. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DETERMINE
  79. PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT LYNN SNODERLY'S NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS
  80. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER SEEKING ACCESS TO THE JOINTLY OWNED PROPERTIES
  81. NOTICE OF ADD AUTHORITY RE NO CVL R
  82. THE COURT UPON THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT LYNN SNODERLY, REQUESTING THAT THE COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF TWO CASES CONCLUDED IN THE SUMMIT COUNTY PROBATE COURT. THE COURT FINDS THE ABOVE-REFERENCED PROBATE COURT CASES ARE IRRELEVANT TO THE INSTANT MATTER. DEFENDANT’S MOTION IS THEREFORE DENIED. CC
  83. THE COURT FINDS THE MOTION WELL TAKEN AND THE SAME IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT LYNN SNODERLY SHALL FILE HER ANSWER HEREIN ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 14, 2023. CC
  84. CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE. THE PARTY WITH THE BURDEN OF PROOF AS TO A PARTICULAR ISSUE SHALL IDENTIFY TRIAL EXPERTS BY APRIL 5, 2024 AND THE RESPONDING PARTY BY MAY 31, 2024. ALL FACT DISCOVERY IS TO BE COMPLETED BY JANUARY 31, 2024. ALL TRIAL DISCOVERY IS TO BE COMPLETED BY JULY 16, 2024. A TRIAL DATE IS FIXED AT JULY 30, 2024 AT 9:00 A.M. A FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SET FOR JULY 16, 2024 AT 9:00 A.M. CC
  85. MAGISTRATE'S ORDER. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN AUGUST 18, 2023. PLAINTIFF SHALL ALSO FILE MOTION REQUESTING INSPECTION OF THE PROPERTIES NO LATER THAN AUGUST 8, 2023. DEFENDANT SHALL RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REQUESTS AND FILE HER MOTION AND BRIEF WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT APPLY OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE TO THIS CASE NO LATER THAN AUGUST 18, 2023. PARTITIION HEARING IS SET FOR SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 AT 9:00AM BEFORE JUDGE CROCE. THIS IS AN IN-PERSON HEARING. MAGISTRATE LYNNE M EARHART
  86. MOTION FOR DEFENDANT TO APPEAR VIA ZOOM
  87. MOTION TO DETERMINE
  88. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  89. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS
  90. PRETRIAL EXHIBITS
  91. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF BANK TAX PROD
  92. NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL PRETRIAL EXHIBITS LYNN
  93. EXHIBIT TO
  94. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  95. LYNN SNODERLY PRETRIAL BRIEF
  96. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  97. FILING CORRECTED INITIAL DISCLOSURES LYNN
  98. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS' INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3)
  99. PRETRIAL STATEMENT OF JO ANN MARCINKOSKI AND PAUL R. MARCINKOSKI, CO-TRUSTEES OF THE MARCINKOSKI FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
  100. DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENT
  101. AGREED DISCOVERY PLAN
  102. PRETRIAL STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF
  103. DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENT
  104. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  105. LYNN DISCOVERY PROPOSALS
  106. DEFENDANTS INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  107. MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE
  108. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  109. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY SHAWN A. WILSON AS CO-COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS, PAUL R. MARCINKOSKI AND JO ANN MARCINKOSKI
  110. DEFENDANT CATHERINE CARY SNODERLY'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
  111. ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  112. NOTIFICATION OF FAILURE TO OBTAIN SERVICE ELIZABETH SNODERLY
  113. Certified Mail Service - Unable To Forward ELIZABETH SNODERLY
  114. FedEx Service - Served ELIZABETH SNODERLY
  115. Process Server - Served LYNN SNODERLY
  116. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed JAMIE M. HAREN
  117. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed CATHERINE SNODERLY
  118. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed JAMIE M. HAREN
  119. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed CATHERINE SNODERLY
  120. NUNC PRO TUNC PRETRIAL CONFERENCE A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE ON AUGUST 2, 2023 AT 8:30 A.M. THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE CONDUCTED IN PERSON. CC
  121. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING HAREN, JAMIE M.
  122. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING SNODERLY, CATHERINE
  123. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY MEGAN E VOGT AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT CATHERINE CARY SNODERLY AKA CATHERINE DOBYAN
  124. LEAVE TO PLEAD
  125. A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE ON AUGUST 2, 2023 AT 8:30 A.M.THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE CONDUCTED IN PERSON. CC
  126. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY DANIEL P KRUPKO AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT ELIZABETH SNODERLY
  127. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY JAMIE M HAREN AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS PAUL R MARCINKOSKI AND JO ANN MARCINKOSKI
  128. ANSWER OF JA ANN MARCINKOSKI AND PAUL R. MARCINKOSKI, CO-TRUSTEES OF THE MARCINKOSKI FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
  129. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY MARK H LUDWIG AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT LYNNMARIE SNODERLY
  130. SUMMONS ISSUED BY PROCESS SERVER SNODERLY, LYNN
  131. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE
  132. SUMMONS ISSUED BY FEDEX SNODERLY, ELIZABETH
  133. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE
  134. ORDER APPOINTING PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER. CC
  135. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROCESS SERVER
  136. Certified Mail Service - Served CATHERINE SNODERLY
  137. Certified Mail Service - Served PAUL R. MARCINKOSKI
  138. Certified Mail Service - Served JO ANN MARCINKOSKI
  139. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail MARCINKOSKI, PAUL R.
  140. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail SNODERLY, LYNN
  141. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail MARCINKOSKI, JO ANN
  142. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail SNODERLY, ELIZABETH
  143. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail SNODERLY, CATHERINE
  144. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED
  145. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more