Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-04-14
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Alexis R Hannah
Photo of Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Judge

Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. MOTION FILED FOR P1 DISCOVER BANK GRANT MARSHALL 0105137 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  3. REFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO CAPITAL ONE N.A. SBM TO DISCOVER BANK
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58240058) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ALEXIS R HANNAH 9602 CUMBERLAND AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44104
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58240057) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  6. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 09/25/2025. NEITHER COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF NOR DEFENDANT APPEARED. PURSUANT TO THIS COURT'S 08/28/2025 ORDER, THIS MATTER IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 08/28/2025. NEITHER COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF NOR DEFENDANT APPEARED. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 09/25/2025 AT 09:15 AM. HEARING TO BE HELD VIA TELEPHONE. PARTIES TO CALL THE COURT AT (216) 443-8604 AT THAT TIME. DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN A JUDGMENT ISSUED AGAINST DEFENDANT. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO APPEAR OR FULLY COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. PRIOR TO THE HEARING, PLAINTIFF TO FILE: (1) PROOF OF SERVICE; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT OR PROOF OF DAMAGES; (3) A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY; (4) A COPY OF THE LETTER SENT TO THE DEFENDANT AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING NOTIFYING DEFENDANT OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE HEARING AND THE FACT THAT A JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT AT THAT TIME SENT BY BOTH REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE APPEAR IN THIS MATTER AFTER BEING DULY SERVED WITH THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 08/28/2025 AT 10:00 AM. HEARING TO BE HELD VIA TELEPHONE. PARTIES TO CALL THE COURT AT (216) 443-8604 AT THAT TIME. DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN A JUDGMENT ISSUED AGAINST DEFENDANT. PRIOR TO THE HEARING, PLAINTIFF TO FILE: (1) PROOF OF SERVICE; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT OR PROOF OF DAMAGES; (3) A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY; (4) A COPY OF THE LETTER SENT TO THE DEFENDANT AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING NOTIFYING DEFENDANT OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE HEARING AND THE FACT THAT A JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT AT THAT TIME SENT BY BOTH REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56694040 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/19/2025 HANNAH/ALEXIS/R PROCESSED BY COC 04/23/2025.
  10. SUMS COMPLAINT(56694040) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ALEXIS R HANNAH 9602 CUMBERLAND AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44104
  11. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  12. WRIT FEE
  13. JUDGE ANDREW J. SANTOLI ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  14. LEGAL RESEARCH
  15. LEGAL NEWS
  16. LEGAL AID
  17. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  18. COMPUTER FEE
  19. CLERK'S FEE
  20. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more