Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-05
Status Pending
Type Trust Internal Affairs Petition
Docket 5 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Manion , James

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Comment Petition for Order Declaring the Failure of Trust for Lack of Beneficiaries; the Imposition of a Resulting Trust; and Determining the Identity of the Beneficiaries of the Resulting Trust; Memorandum of Points and Authorities Offered in Aid Court's Determination; and Supporting Declarations
  2. Comment -with PSP-Petition for Order Declaring the Failure of Trust, etc-01/09/2025
  3. View Document Petition for Order 01/09/2025 Judicial Officer Myers, Brett V. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing Comment NOT READY FOR HEARING Petition for Order Declaring the Failure of Trust for Lack of Beneficiaries; the Imposition of a Resulting Trust; and Determining the Identity of the Beneficiaries of the Resulting Trust; Memorandum of Points and Authorities Offered in Aid Court's Determination; and Supporting Declarations NOTES: 1. Need proof of notice to "Javier and Wife" and consulates of Poland, United Kingdom, and Finland; PrC 17203, 8113 2. Notice to beneficiaries outside of United States not timely; PrC 17203; CCP 1005(b) [notice complete on 20th day after mailing] 3. Need authority for petitioner's assertion that California City real property is a trust asset; trust does not include a schedule of assets and no general assignment of assets to the trust filed 4. Need copy of current title document to real property; is property titled in name of trust? 5. Petition does not state why a resulting trust is necessary when decedent had a will, a petition for probate of will is pending, and petitioner contends that will provides the proper disposition of estate
  4. Comment Notice of Hearing for Petition for Order / HRG 03-21-2025 / J-1
  5. Comment Verified Supplement No. One to Petition for Order Declaring the Failure of Trust for Lack of Beneficiaries; the Imposition of A Resulting Trust; and Determining the Identity of the Beneficiaries of the Resulting Trust

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more