Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Clark Court

Court

Clark Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-23
Type Negligence Auto
Docket 52 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Loveland, Gail
Defendant Durango Petroleum Llc Doing Business As Conoco Gas Station
Photo of Hon. Holthus Mary Kay

Judge

Hon. Holthus Mary Kay

Clark County (NV)

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Jury Trial (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay)
  2. Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure Doc ID# 2 [2] Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
  3. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 3 [3] Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending - SEI
  4. Affidavit of Service Doc ID# 4 [4] Affidavit of Service
  5. Answer Doc ID# 5 [5] Defendant Durango Petroleum, LLC's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint
  6. Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure Doc ID# 6 [6] Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure (NRS Chapter 19)
  7. Demand for Jury Trial Doc ID# 7 [7] Demand for Jury Trial
  8. Request for Exemption From Arbitration Doc ID# 8 [8] Request for Exemption from Arbitration
  9. Commissioners Decision on Request for Exemption - Granted Doc ID# 9 [9] Commissioner's Decision on Request for Exemption - GRANTED
  10. Notice of Early Case Conference Doc ID# 10 [10] Notice of Early Case Conference
  11. Joint Case Conference Report Doc ID# 11 [11] Joint Case Conference Report
  12. Order Doc ID# 12 [12] Order Scheduling Mandatory Case Management Conference
  13. Audiovisual Transmission Equipment Appearance Request Doc ID# 13 [13] Plaintiff's Notice of Intent to Appear by Simultaneous Audiovisual or Telephonic Transmission Equipment
  14. Audiovisual Transmission Equipment Appearance Request Doc ID# 14 [14] Plaintiff's Notice of Intent to Appear by Simultaneous Audiovisual or Telephonic Transmission Equipment
  15. Audiovisual Transmission Equipment Appearance Request Doc ID# 15 [15] Defendant Durango Petroleum, LLC's Notice of Intent to Appear by Audiovisual Transmission Equipment
  16. Mandatory Rule 16 Conference (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Parties Present Minutes Result: Matter Heard
  17. Scheduling and Trial Order Doc ID# 16 [16] Scheduling Order and Order Setting Civil Jury Trial, Pre Trial Conference/Calendar Call
  18. Notice of Association of Counsel Doc ID# 17 [17] Notice of Association of Counsel
  19. Stipulation and Order to Amend Doc ID# 18 [18] Stipulation and Order to Amend Caption
  20. Notice of Entry Doc ID# 19 [19] Notice of Entry of Stipulation and Order to Amend Caption
  21. Motion Doc ID# 20 [20] Plaintiff's Motion to Strike for Spoliation
  22. Clerk's Notice of Hearing Doc ID# 21 [21] Notice of Hearing
  23. Opposition to Motion Doc ID# 22 [22] Defendant's Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion To Strike For Spoliation Of Evidence
  24. Reply to Opposition Doc ID# 23 [23] Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike for Spoliation of Evidence
  25. Order Doc ID# 24 [24] Order Rescheduling Hearing
  26. Motion to Extend Discovery Doc ID# 25 [25] Defendant's Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines on Order Shortening Time
  27. Clerk's Notice of Hearing Doc ID# 26 [26] Clerk's Notice of Hearing
  28. Motion to Extend Discovery Doc ID# 27 [27] Defendant's Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines on OST
  29. Order Shortening Time Doc ID# 28 [28] Plaintiff Gail Loveland's Motion for Preferential Trial Setting: Age 73 on Order Shortening Time
  30. Opposition to Motion Doc ID# 29 [29] Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff Gail Loveland's Motion for Preferential Trial Setting: Age 73 on Order Shortening Time
  31. Motion to Extend Discovery (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Defendant's Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines on Order Shortening Time 12/02/2025 Reset by Court to 11/04/2025 Result: Granted
  32. Motion (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Plaintiff's Motion for Preferential Trial Setting on OST Result: Granted in Part
  33. All Pending Motions (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Parties Present Minutes Result: Matter Heard
  34. Order Granting Motion Doc ID# 30 [30] Order Granting Defendants Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines on Order Shortening Time
  35. Notice of Entry of Order Doc ID# 31 [31] Notice of Entry of Order Granting Defendant LV Petroleum, LLC, d/b/a Durango Petroleum, LLC, d/b/a Conoco Gas Station's Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines on order Shortening Time
  36. Order Doc ID# 32 [32] Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Preferential Trial Setting
  37. Notice of Entry Doc ID# 33 [33] Notice of Entry of Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff Gail Loveland's Motion for Preferential Trial Setting on Order Shortening Time
  38. Motion to Strike (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Plaintiff's Motion to Strike for Spoliation of Evidence Parties Present Minutes 10/21/2025 Reset by Court to 12/09/2025 Result: Denied in Part
  39. Motion to Extend Discovery Doc ID# 34 [34] DEFENDANTS LIMITED MOTION TO REOPEN EXPERT DISCOVERY AND EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE ON ORDER SHORTENING TIME
  40. Motion to Extend Discovery Doc ID# 35 [35] Defendant's Limited Motion to Reopen Expert Discovery on Order Shortening Time
  41. Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Doc ID# 36 [36] Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Duty and to Certain Affirmative Defenses
  42. Opposition to Motion Doc ID# 37 [37] Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Reopen Expert Discovery and Extend Discovery Deadline on Order Shortening Time
  43. Reply in Support Doc ID# 38 [38] Defendant's Reply in Support of Limited Motion to Reopen Expert Discovery and Extend Discovery Deadline on Order Shortening Time
  44. Clerk's Notice of Hearing Doc ID# 39 [39] Clerk's Notice of Hearing
  45. Motion (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Defendant's Limited Motion to Reopen Expert Discovery on Order Shortening Time Parties Present Minutes Result: Denied
  46. Order Denying Motion Doc ID# 40 [40] Order Denying Defendants Limited Motion to Extend Discovery AND Extend Discovery Deadline on Order Shortening Time
  47. Opposition to Motion Doc ID# 41 [41] Defendant's opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgement as to Duty and to Certain Defenses
  48. Notice of Entry Doc ID# 42 [42] Notice of Entry of Order Denying Defendants Limited Motion to Reopen Expert Discovery and Extend Discovery Deadline On Order Shortening Time
  49. Reply Doc ID# 43 [43] Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment as to Duty and Certain Defenses
  50. Status Check (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Status Check: Stipulation and Order
  51. Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay) Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Duty and to Certain Affirmative Defenses
  52. Calendar Call (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holthus, Mary Kay)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more