Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Waterbury County

Court

Waterbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-04-09
Type C 40 Contracts Collections
Docket 20 entries
Disposition summary judgment-plaintiff

Parties

Plaintiff M&t Bank
Defendant Chef K, Inc.|Karen A Williams A/k/a Karen Williams
Photo of Hon. Hon John Cordani

Judge

Hon. Hon John Cordani

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMARY JUDGMENT-PLAINTIFF RESULT: HON JOHN CORDANI
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 RESULT: Denied 9/22/2025 HON JOHN CORDANI
  6. ORDER RESULT: Denied 9/22/2025 HON JOHN CORDANI
  7. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Motion to Dismiss
  8. OBJECTION TO MOTION Objection to Defendant Karen Williams' Motion to Dismiss
  9. AMENDED WRIT AND SUMMONS Amended Writ/Summons for additional service on Defendant Karen Williams
  10. RETURN OF SERVICE Return of service for additional service on Defendant Karen Williams
  11. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN Supplemental Return for service on Karen Williams in New York, NY (4/3/25)
  12. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  13. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION Notes: Coded In Error - 09/19/2025
  14. REPLACE RECORD TO PLEADING STATUS (KEYPOINT 2) AND ERASE ALL HIGHER KEYPOINT DATES
  15. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 10/31/2025 BY THE CLERK
  16. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/31/2025 BY THE CLERK
  17. ANSWER
  18. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESULT: Granted 4/13/2026 HON JOHN CORDANI
  19. ORDER RESULT: Off 2/27/2026 BY THE CLERK
  20. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/13/2026 HON JOHN CORDANI

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more