Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-08
Type Estate Of, Deceased
Docket 61 entries
Disposition SETTLEMENT
Photo of Hon. Tate Stuart

Judge

Hon. Tate Stuart

Osage County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION
  2. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  3. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  4. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  5. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  7. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  9. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  11. THE POUR OVER LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF CORNELIOUS DEAN FINLEY
  12. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
  13. ORDER FOR HEARING PETITION FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND FOR DETERMINATION OF IDENTITY OF HEIRS, DEVISEES AND LEGATEES
  14. NOTICE FOR HEARING PETITION FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND FOR DETERMINATION OF IDENTITY OF HEIRS, DEVIEES AND LEGATEES
  15. DECLINATION TO SERVE
  16. LETTER FROM PHYLLIS J TAPP
  17. CM; SLT; COMES ON FOR PET HRG; RICHARD BORG PRESENT; NOTICE IS PROPER, VENUE IS PROPER, THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION; COURT CONVENES ON PETITION HEARING AND CONTINUES TO NEW DATE. MATTER TO RECONVENE ON 7/22/24 @ 8:30AM.
  18. CT MINUTE
  19. CM; SLT; COURT CONFERRED WITH THE HONORABLE KURT GLASCOW, TULSA COUNTY REGARDING MR. FINLEY. TULSA COUNTY CASE PB-23-605, FILED JUNE 12, 2023, AND REMAINS PENDING WITH ORDERS ENTERED ON THE ESTATE OF CORNELIOUS DEAN FINLEY. THE UNDERSIGNED ORDERS, THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO JUDGE GLASCOW FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. HEARING DATE OF 7/22/24 @ 8:30AM STRICKEN. PARTIES TO CONTACT JUDGE GLASCOW FOR FURTHER SETTINGS AND PROCEEDINGS. COPY TO COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER AND JUDGE GLASCOW
  20. CT MINUTE
  21. ORDER VACATING PRIOR MINUTE ENTRY AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT FACTS AND LAW ON THE ISSUE OF TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE REGARDING JURISDICTION
  22. ORDER TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE REGARDING JURISDICTION AND DISMISSAL
  23. ORDER AND NOTICE FORHEARING MOTION TO VACATE ORDER TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE REGARDING JURISDICTION AND DISMISSAL FILED AUGUST 30, 2024
  24. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
  25. MOTION TO VACATE ORDER TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE REGARDING JURISDICTION AND DISMISSAL FILED AUGUST 30, 2024.
  26. ORDER
  27. CM; SLT; COMES ON FOR MTN TO VACATE AND DISMISSAL; APPEARANCES; RICHARD BORG; NOTICE IS PROPER, VENUE IS PROPER, THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION
  28. CT MINUTE
  29. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OSAGE COUNTY BEING THE PROPER JURISDICTION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
  30. LETTER FROM PHYLLIS J TAPP
  31. ORDER
  32. ORDER AND NOTICE FOR HEARING MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2024
  33. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
  34. MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2024
  35. CM; SLT; COMES ON FOR MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER OF 11/26/24; APPEARANCES: RICHARD BORG, PHYLLIS TAPP (BY TEAMS) NOTICE IS PROPER, VENUE IS PROPER, THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION; COURT'S ORDER OF 11/26/24 IS RATIFIED. ADDITIONALLY, COURT ORDERS ANY PRIOR ORDERS REGARDING ESTATE OF CORNLEIOUS FINLEY OUTSIDE OF OSAGE COUNTY ARE VOID FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
  36. CT MINUTE
  37. NOTICE FOR HEARING PETITION FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND FOR DETERMINATION OF IDENTITY OF HEIRS, DEVISEES AND LEGATEES
  38. ORDER FOR HEARIN PETITION FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND FOR DETERMINATION OF IDENTITY OF HEIRS, DEVISEES AND LEGATEES
  39. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  40. PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CORNELIOUS DEAN FINLEY
  41. CREDITOR'S CLAIM
  42. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  43. ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
  44. NOTICE OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE CORNELIOUS DEAN FINLEY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 23, 2017
  45. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
  46. CM; SLT; COMES ON FOR PETITION HEARING; APPEARANCES: RICHARD BORG, JAMES GOODWIN; PARTIES ORDERED TO MEDIATION PRIOR TO NEXT HEARING; MATTER TO RECONVENE ON 4/1/25 @ 2:30PM.
  47. CT MINUTE
  48. ORDER APPOINTING TRRUSTEE FROM JUDGE KURT GLASSCO
  49. OBJECTION TO PHYLISS TAPP'S PETITION TO BE APPOINTED PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
  50. CM; SLT; COMES ON FOR PET. HRG; APPEARANCE RICHARD BORG; NOTICE IS PROPER, VENUE IS PROPER, THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION, HEIRS DETERMINED, LETTERS TO ISSUE, WILL PROVED, BOND IN AMOUNT OF $0; ORDER APPROVED. SETTLEMENT REACHED AS TO CREDITORS CLAIM. AGREED ORDER TO BE SUBMITTED.
  51. CT MINUTE
  52. ORDER APPOINTING PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CORNELIOUS DEAN FINLEY AND DETERMINING HEIRS, DEVISEES AND LEGATEES
  53. LETTERS TESTAMENTARY
  54. APPLICATION BY PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO 58 O.S. SECTIONS 239 & 281
  55. ORDER PURSUANT TO 58 O.S. SECTIONS 230 & 281
  56. NOTICE TO CREDITORS
  57. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
  58. AMENDED NOTICE TO CREDITORS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more