Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 41 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Roto Rooter Services Company
Defendant Marsha Hardy
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. COURT COST ASSESSED ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY BILL AMOUNT 252.21 PAID AMOUNT 250 AMOUNT DUE 2.21
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57229978) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MARSHA HARDY 760 E 249TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57229977) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JON CONNOR [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57229976) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JON CONNOR [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57229975) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRAD A COUNCIL [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57229974) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRAD A COUNCIL [email protected]
  8. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A DEFAULT HEARING ON JUNE 10, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED JUNE 3, 2025, IS GRANTED, AND JUDGMENT ON THE COMPLAINT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY AND AGAINST DEFENDANT MARSHA HARDY IN AMOUNT OF $26,971.30. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. DEFENDANT MARSHA HARDY WAS SERVED WITH THE COMPLAINT ON MAY 5, 2025, AND IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER. ON JUNE 3, 2025, THE PLAINTIFF FILED A CIVIL RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. THE JUNE 10 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS THEREFORE CONVERTED TO A HEARING ON THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. FAILURE OF THE DEFENDANT TO APPEAR AND DEFEND AT THE HEARING MAY RESULT IN A MONEY JUDGMENT AGAINST HER. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY ATTORNEY JON CONNOR 0097098 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  11. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  12. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56830971 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/05/2025 HARDY/MARSHA/ PROCESSED BY COC 05/14/2025.
  13. SUMS COMPLAINT(56830971) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARSHA HARDY 760 E 249TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123
  14. WRIT FEE
  15. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE
  17. THIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON APRIL 22, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. ANOTHER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SET AS FOLLOWS: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/10/2025 AT 10:00 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. THE DEFENDANT HAS UNTIL MAY 16, 2025, TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. IF THE DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER AFTER THAT DATE, THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE CONVERTED TO A DEFAULT HEARING IF THE PLAINTIFF FILES A CIVIL RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE JUNE 10, 2025. THE DEFENDANT IS NOTIFIED THAT A MONEY JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST HER AT A DEFAULT HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. SUMS COMPLAINT(56724540) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MARSHA HARDY 760 E 249TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123 ANSWER DATE: 05/16/2025
  19. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  20. WRIT FEE
  21. PRAECIPE FILED REQUEST FOR ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE UNDER RULE 4.6 (C) OR (D)
  22. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56313248 RETURNED 03/31/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HARDY/MARSHA/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  23. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56313248 RETURNED 3/31/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HARDY/MARSHA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  24. CUYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT SERVICE FEE $34.00
  25. 56313264 ON 03/13/2025 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED HARDY/MARSHA/ BY LEAVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON.
  26. SHERIFF SERVICE PACKET
  27. SUMS COMPLAINT(56313248) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARSHA HARDY 760 E 249TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123
  28. SUMS COMPLAINT(56313264) SENT BY CUYAHOGA SHERIFF SERVICE. TO: MARSHA HARDY 760 E 249TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123
  29. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/22/2025 AT 10:30 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. NOTICE ISSUED
  30. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  31. WRIT FEE
  32. WRIT FEE
  33. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  35. LEGAL RESEARCH
  36. LEGAL NEWS
  37. LEGAL AID
  38. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  39. COMPUTER FEE
  40. CLERK'S FEE
  41. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID BRAD A COUNCIL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more