Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Clark Court

Court

Clark Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-27
Type Negligence Other Negligence
Docket 48 entries
Disposition order of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Donato, Vince
Defendant Thorpol, Jake
Photo of Hon. ( Denton, Mark R.)

Judge

Hon. ( Denton, Mark R.)

Clark County (NV)

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Jury Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.)
  2. Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure Doc ID# 2 [2] Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
  3. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 3 [3] Summons
  4. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 4 [4] Summons
  5. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Allf, Nancy) Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Injunction on Order Shortening Time (Temporary Restraining Order) Parties Present Minutes Result: Granted
  6. Notice of Appearance Doc ID# 5 [5] Notice of Appearance
  7. Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure Doc ID# 6 [6] Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
  8. Order Doc ID# 7 [7] Order Regarding Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Injunction On Order Shortening Time
  9. Order Doc ID# 8 [8] Order Regarding Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Injunction on Order Shortening Time
  10. Notice of Entry of Order Doc ID# 9 [9] NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION FOR INJUNCTION ON ORDER SHORTENING TIME
  11. Motion for Preliminary Injunction (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.) Parties Present Minutes Result: Moot
  12. Motion for Judgment Doc ID# 10 [10] Defendant Carmax Business Services, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Nev. R. Civ. P. 12(c) or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment
  13. Clerk's Notice of Hearing Doc ID# 11 [11] Notice of Hearing
  14. Opposition to Motion Doc ID# 12 [12] Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant Carmax Businessf Services, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Nev. R. Civ. P. 12 (c) or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Nev. R. Civ. P. 56(c)
  15. Notice of Withdrawal of Attorney Doc ID# 13 [13] Notice of Disassociation of Counsel
  16. Reply in Support Doc ID# 14 [14] Defendant Carmax Business Services, LLC's Reply in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Nev. R. Civ. P. 12(c) or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Nev. R. Civ. P. 56(c)
  17. Motion (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.) Defendant Carmax Business Services, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Nev. R. Civ. P. 12(c) or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Parties Present Minutes Result: Denied Without Prejudice
  18. Answer Doc ID# 15 [15] Defendant Carmax Business Services, LLC's 1) Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint; 2) Cross-Claim against Jake Thorpol; and 3) Third-Party Complaint against Selena Giggles Jasmin Leo and Cory James Teruo Carares
  19. Demand for Jury Trial Doc ID# 16 [16] Demand for Jury Trial
  20. Disclosure Statement Doc ID# 17 [17] Disclosure Statement Pursuant to NRCP 7.1
  21. Consent to Service By Electronic Means Doc ID# 18 [18] Consent to Electronic Service
  22. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 20 [20] Summons on Cross-Claim to Thorpol
  23. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 21 [21] Summons on Third-Party Complaint to Leo
  24. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 22 [22] Summons on Third-Party Complaint to Carares
  25. Request for Exemption From Arbitration Doc ID# 19 [19] Plaintiffs' Request for Exemption
  26. Opposition to Request for Exemption Doc ID# 23 [23] Defendant/ Cross-Claimant/ Third-Party Plaintiff Carmax Business Services, LLC's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Request for Exemption for Arbitration
  27. Individual Case Conference Report Doc ID# 24 [24] Indvidual Case Conference Report
  28. Notice to Appear for Arb Conference on Request for Exemption Doc ID# 25 [25] NOTICE TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL FACTS REGARDING EXEMPTION FROM ARBITRATION
  29. Supplement Doc ID# 26 [26] Plaintiffs' Supplement in Support of Request for Exemption
  30. Arbitration Conference (1:20 PM) (Judicial Officer Ganz, Adam) Request for Exemption via Zoom Parties Present Minutes Result: Granted
  31. Commissioners Decision on Request for Exemption - Granted Doc ID# 27 [27] ADR Commissioner's Decision on Arbitration Exemption
  32. Order Doc ID# 28 [28] Order
  33. Individual Case Conference Report Doc ID# 29 [29] Defendant's Individual Case Conference Report
  34. Mandatory Rule 16 Conference (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.) Parties Present Minutes Result: Matter Heard
  35. Affidavit Doc ID# 30 [30] Declaration of Attempted Service
  36. Affidavit Doc ID# 31 [31] Declaration of Attempted Service
  37. Scheduling and Trial Order Doc ID# 32 [32] Order Re Rule 16 Conference, Setting Civil Jury Trial, Pre-Trial, Calendar Call, and Deadlines for Motions; Discovery Scheduling Order
  38. Motion Doc ID# 33 [33] Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Third-Party Plaintiff Carmax Business Services, LLC's Motion to Extend Time to Serve Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants and for Service by Publication
  39. Clerk's Notice of Hearing Doc ID# 34 [34] Notice of Hearing
  40. Motion to Compel Doc ID# 35 [35] Plaintiffs' First Motion to Compel Discovey
  41. Notice of Intent Doc ID# 36 [36] Plaintiffs' Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoena Duces Tecum
  42. Clerk's Notice of Hearing Doc ID# 37 [37] Clerk's Notice of Hearing
  43. Motion (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.) Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Third-Party Plaintiff Carmax Business Services, LLC's Motion to Extend Time to Serve Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants and for Service by Publication Minutes Result: Withdrawn
  44. Notice of Withdrawal Doc ID# 38 [38] NOTICE OF WITHDRAWL OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
  45. Stipulation and Order for Dismissal Doc ID# 39 [39] Stipulation and Order Dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint Against Carmax Business Services, LLC
  46. CANCELED Motion to Compel (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Ganz, Adam) Vacated Plaintiffs' First Motion to Compel Discovey
  47. Pre Trial Conference (4:05 PM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.)
  48. Calendar Call (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more