Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-04-02
Status INACTIVE
Type Miscellaneous Other
Docket 24 entries

Parties

Plaintiff City Of East Cleveland, Ohio C/o Regional Income Tax Agency
Defendant Bridgette R. Smith
Photo of Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Judge

Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. REFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO STACIE HACKEL SNOW
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57197636) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: BRIDGETTE R. SMITH 15525 GLYNN ROAD EAST CLEVELAND, OH 44112
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57197635) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRITTANY D. CARABALLO [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57197634) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: AMBER E GREENLEAF DUBER [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57197633) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: STACIE HACKEL SNOW [email protected]
  7. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 06/04/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL; DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 06/02/2025, IS GRANTED. THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,058.00, PLUS INTEREST AT THE APPLICABLE STATUTORY RATE (8.00%) FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION AND POST-JUDGEMENT COLLECTION COSTS AND FEES AS PROVIDED IN R.C. 718.27 (G). OSJ. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO ATTORNEY STACIE HACKEL SNOW 0080242 AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY STATUS
  9. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO ATTORNEY STACIE HACKEL SNOW 0080242 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  10. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO ATTORNEY STACIE HACKEL SNOW 0080242 AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES
  11. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO'S, MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  12. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT DEFENDANT WAS SERVED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON 04/09/2025. DEFENDANT WAS REQUIRED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 05/07/2025. AS OF 05/09/2025, NO ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED. CASE IS HEREBY SET FOR DEFAULT HEARING. PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THIS ORDER. ANY MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OR CONTINUANCES MUST BE MADE IN WRITING AND FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS. ORAL MOTIONS FOR CONTINUANCES WILL NOT BE ENTERTAINED. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/04/2025 AT 9:00 A.M. PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE TO WAIT IN THE 20TH FLOOR LOBBY FOR THIS CASE TO BE CALLED. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY MUST FILE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS PRIOR TO THE HEARING: 1. THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT; 2. JUDGMENT ENTRY REFLECTING PRINCIPAL DUE WITHOUT REGARD TO ACCRUED INTEREST; 3. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY AVERRING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND RULES; AND 4. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE PROVING DAMAGES. 5. PLAINTIFF IS REQUIRED TO NOTIFY IN WRITING ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE HEARING DATE. PROOF OF TIMELY MAILING OF SUCH NOTICE MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DEFAULT HEARING. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT OR PROOF OF CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ATTEMPTS, AVAILABLE FROM THE USPS WEBSITE, IS ALSO REQUIRED. 6. EVIDENCE OF MILITARY SERVICE STATUS OF DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO THE SERVICEMEMBERS' CIVIL RELIEF ACT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(B)(1). DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/04/2025 AT 09:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56584264 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/09/2025 SMITH/BRIDGETTE/R. PROCESSED BY COC 04/16/2025.
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(56584264) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BRIDGETTE R. SMITH 15525 GLYNN ROAD EAST CLEVELAND, OH 44112
  15. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. WRIT FEE
  17. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  18. LEGAL RESEARCH
  19. LEGAL NEWS
  20. LEGAL AID
  21. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  22. COMPUTER FEE
  23. CLERK'S FEE
  24. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID STACIE HACKEL SNOW

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more