Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-26
Status ACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 107 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Keybank National Association
Defendant Sheila Rodic|Unk. Spouse If Any Of Sheila Rodic|Terry Quinn|Marsha Quinn|Patrick J. Quinn Jr.|Unk. Spouse If Any Of Patrick J. Quinn Jr.|Joseph C. Quinn|Renee Quinn|Consuela M. Rodic|Unk. Spouse If Any Of Consuela M. Rodic|Charles T. Quinn|Unk. Spouse If Any Of Charles T. Quinn|Kellie A. Quinn Bauman|Brad Bauman|Quinn M. Kara Goodman|Unk. Spouse If Any Of Quinn M. Kara Goodman|Tyler J. Kara|Unk. Spouse If Any Of Tyler J. Kara|Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. Nominee For Keybank National Association|Unk. Heirs Etc. Charlene F. Quinn, Deceased|Newrez Llc Dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Photo of Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Judge

Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/24/2025 AT 08:45 AM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  2. NSWER FILED BY D1 SHEILA RODIC ATTORNEY NICHOLAS WEISS 0090799 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS
  3. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED D1 SHEILA RODIC NICHOLAS WEISS 0090799. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  4. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56228756 RETURNED 3/24/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT QUINN JR./PATRICK/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  5. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228761 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/14/2025 UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF CONSUELA M. RODIC PROCESSED BY COC 03/19/2025.
  6. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228760 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/14/2025 RODIC/CONSUELA/M. PROCESSED BY COC 03/19/2025.
  7. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228759 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/11/2025 QUINN/RENEE/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/19/2025.
  8. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56228765 RETURNED 3/18/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF CHARLES T. QUINN - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  9. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56228763 RETURNED 3/18/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT QUINN/CHARLES/T. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  10. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(56376170) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NEWREZ LLC DBA SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING C/O CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY S/A 50 WEST BROAD STREET, SUITE 1330 COLUMBUS, OH 43215-0000
  11. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  12. RIT FEE
  13. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  14. MENDED COMPLAINT $75 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FORECLOSURE
  15. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228772 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF TYLER J. KARA PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  16. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228771 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 KARA/TYLER/J. PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  17. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228770 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF QUINN M. KARA GOODMAN PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  18. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228769 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 KARA GOODMAN/QUINN/M. PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  19. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228768 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/04/2025 BAUMAN/BRAD/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  20. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228767 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 QUINN BAUMAN/KELLIE/A. PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  21. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228766 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 QUINN BAUMAN/KELLIE/A. PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  22. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228764 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF CHARLES T. QUINN PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  23. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228762 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 QUINN/CHARLES/T. PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  24. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228758 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/05/2025 QUINN/JOSEPH/C. PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  25. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228755 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 QUINN/MARSHA/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  26. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228754 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 QUINN/TERRY/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  27. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228753 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF SHEILA RODIC PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  28. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56228752 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/03/2025 RODIC/SHEILA/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/12/2025.
  29. UMS COMPLAINT(56228773) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 1901 E. VOORHEES STREET, SUITE C DANVILLE, IL 61834
  30. UMS COMPLAINT(56228772) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF TYLER J. KARA 3612 WADSWORTH ROAD NORTON, OH 44203
  31. UMS COMPLAINT(56228771) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TYLER J. KARA 3612 WADSWORTH ROAD NORTON, OH 44203
  32. UMS COMPLAINT(56228770) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF QUINN M. KARA GOODMAN 2951 WAYNE STREET NORTON, OH 44203
  33. UMS COMPLAINT(56228769) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: QUINN M. KARA GOODMAN 2951 WAYNE STREET NORTON, OH 44203
  34. UMS COMPLAINT(56228768) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BRAD BAUMAN 3790 YOST ROAD LITCHFIELD, OH 44253
  35. UMS COMPLAINT(56228767) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KELLIE A. QUINN BAUMAN 3790 YOST RD LITCHFIELD, OH 44253-0000
  36. UMS COMPLAINT(56228766) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KELLIE A. QUINN BAUMAN 8139 LAKE ROAD SEVILLE, OH 44273
  37. UMS COMPLAINT(56228765) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF CHARLES T. QUINN 2970 DENISE DRIVE AKRON, OH 44321-0000
  38. UMS COMPLAINT(56228764) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF CHARLES T. QUINN 8139 LAKE ROAD SEVILLE, OH 44273
  39. UMS COMPLAINT(56228763) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHARLES T. QUINN 2970 DENISE DRIVE AKRON, OH 44321-0000
  40. UMS COMPLAINT(56228762) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHARLES T. QUINN 8139 LAKE ROAD SEVILLE, OH 44273
  41. UMS COMPLAINT(56228761) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF CONSUELA M. RODIC 8321 COON CLUB ROAD MEDINA, OH 44256
  42. UMS COMPLAINT(56228760) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CONSUELA M. RODIC 8321 COON CLUB ROAD MEDINA, OH 44256
  43. UMS COMPLAINT(56228759) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RENEE QUINN 23542 REDFERN ROAD COLUMBIA STATION, OH 44028
  44. UMS COMPLAINT(56228758) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOSEPH C. QUINN 23542 REDFERN ROAD COLUMBIA STATION, OH 44028
  45. UMS COMPLAINT(56228756) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PATRICK J. QUINN JR. 5706 HUSS AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
  46. UMS COMPLAINT(56228755) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARSHA QUINN 8139 LAKE ROAD SEVILLE, OH 44273
  47. UMS COMPLAINT(56228754) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TERRY QUINN 8139 LAKE ROAD SEVILLE, OH 44273
  48. UMS COMPLAINT(56228753) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF SHEILA RODIC 1580 POLK DRIVE BRUNSWICK, OH 44212
  49. UMS COMPLAINT(56228752) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SHEILA RODIC 1580 POLK DRIVE BRUNSWICK, OH 44212
  50. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  51. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  52. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  53. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  54. RIT FEE
  55. RIT FEE
  56. RIT FEE
  57. RIT FEE
  58. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  59. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  60. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  61. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  62. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  63. RIT FEE
  64. RIT FEE
  65. RIT FEE
  66. RIT FEE
  67. RIT FEE
  68. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  69. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  70. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  71. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  72. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  73. RIT FEE
  74. RIT FEE
  75. RIT FEE
  76. RIT FEE
  77. RIT FEE
  78. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  79. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  80. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  81. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  82. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  83. RIT FEE
  84. RIT FEE
  85. RIT FEE
  86. UMS COMPLAINT(56228757) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE IF ANY OF PATRICK J. QUINN JR. 5706 HUSS AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
  87. RIT FEE
  88. RIT FEE
  89. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  90. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  91. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  92. RIT FEE
  93. RIT FEE
  94. RIT FEE
  95. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  96. AGISTRATE GINA LUNSFORD ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  97. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  98. UDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  99. DDITIONAL DEPOSIT FOR SERVICE, OVER 10 DEFENDANTS $50
  100. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  101. EGAL RESEARCH
  102. EGAL NEWS
  103. EGAL AID
  104. OMPUTER FEE
  105. LERK'S FEE
  106. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  107. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more