Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-30
Status ACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 111 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Meb Loan Trust Vi, U.s. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Trustee
Defendant The Unknown Heirs At Law, Devisees, Legatees, Administrators, And Executors Of The Estate Of William Trice, Deceased|The Unknown Heirs At Law, Devisees, Legatees, Administrators, And Executors Of The Estate Of Louise Trice, Deceased|W. Cory Phillips|Marcia Hood|John Or Jane Doe, Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Marcia Hood|Robyn Smith King|John Or Jane Doe, Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Robyn Smith King|Alain Trice|John Or Jane Doe, Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Alain Trice|Donna J. Smith|John Or Jane Doe, Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Donna J. Smith|Steven D. Smith|Jane Or John Doe, Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Steven D. Smith|Karen Carlisle|John Or Jane Doe, Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Karen Carlisle
Photo of Hon. Richard a Bell

Judge

Hon. Richard a Bell

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. EGAL NEWS ABSTRACT
  2. ROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED $974.00 - LEGAL NEWS FEE $250.00
  3. RE-PAID PORTION OF SERVICE PUBLICATION FEE $724.00
  4. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988817 RETURNED 02/22/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT TRICE/ALAIN/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  5. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988820 RETURNED 03/04/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF DONNA J. SMITH - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  6. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988819 RETURNED 03/04/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SMITH/DONNA/J. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  7. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988822 RETURNED 02/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE OR JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF STEVEN D. SMITH - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  8. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT
  9. FFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  10. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988823 RETURNED 02/05/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CARLISLE/KAREN/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  11. UMS COMPLAINT(56310645) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JANE OR JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF STEVEN D. SMITH 14100 LAKESHORE BLVD., #409 CLEVELAND, OH 44110 ANSWER DATE: 04/04/2025
  12. UMS COMPLAINT(56310644) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: STEVEN D. SMITH 14100 LAKESHORE BLVD., #409 CLEVELAND, OH 44110 ANSWER DATE: 04/04/2025
  13. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  14. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  15. RIT FEE
  16. RIT FEE
  17. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR SERVICE BY ORIGINAL MAIL
  18. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988820 RETURNED 3/4/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF DONNA J. SMITH - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  19. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988819 RETURNED 3/4/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SMITH/DONNA/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988824 RETURNED 02/05/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF KAREN CARLISLE - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  21. UMS COMPLAINT(56220046) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF DONNA J. SMITH 5151 LEE ROAD APT 202 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137 ANSWER DATE: 03/26/2025
  22. UMS COMPLAINT(56220045) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: DONNA J. SMITH 5151 LEE ROAD APT 202 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137 ANSWER DATE: 03/26/2025
  23. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  24. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  25. RIT FEE
  26. RIT FEE
  27. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR SERVICE BY ORDINARY MAIL
  28. UMS COMPLAINT(56201627) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF ALAIN TRICE 3488 WOODRIDGE ROAD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44121 ANSWER DATE: 03/25/2025
  29. UMS COMPLAINT(56201626) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ALAIN TRICE 3488 WOODRIDGE ROAD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44121 ANSWER DATE: 03/25/2025
  30. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988822 RETURNED 2/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE OR JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF STEVEN D. SMITH - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  31. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988821 RETURNED 2/25/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SMITH/STEVEN/D. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  32. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. RIT FEE
  35. RIT FEE
  36. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR ORDINARY MAIL
  37. URSUANT TO CIV. R. 4(E) AND THE COURT'S STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE, PLAINTIFF MUST PERFECT SERVICE ON ITS COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 07/30/2025 OR SHOW CAUSE WHY IT HAS FAILED TO DO SO. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  38. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988818 RETURNED 2/22/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF ALAIN TRICE - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  39. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988817 RETURNED 2/22/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT TRICE/ALAIN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  40. NSWER FILED BY D3 W. CORY PHILLIPS ATTORNEY W. CORY PHILLIPS 0082489 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT W. CORY PHILLIPS, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LOUISE TRICE
  41. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56066144 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/14/2025 PHILLIPS/W./CORY PROCESSED BY COC 02/19/2025.
  42. SPS RECEIPT NO. 55988814 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/07/2025 JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF MARCIA HOOD PROCESSED BY COC 02/12/2025.
  43. SPS RECEIPT NO. 55988813 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/07/2025 HOOD/MARCIA/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/12/2025.
  44. UMS COMPLAINT(56069094) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF ROBYN SMITH-KING 3209 EAST 134TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44120 ANSWER DATE: 03/10/2025
  45. UMS COMPLAINT(56069093) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ROBYN SMITH-KING 3209 EAST 134TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44120 ANSWER DATE: 03/10/2025
  46. UMS COMPLAINT(56066144) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: W. CORY PHILLIPS 31105 BAINBRIDGE RD. SUITE #4 CLEVELAND, OH 44139-0000
  47. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  48. RIT FEE
  49. RIT FEE
  50. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  51. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  52. RIT FEE
  53. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL
  54. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR SERVICE BY ORIGINAL MAIL
  55. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988816 RETURNED 2/7/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF ROBYN SMITH-KING - REFUSED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  56. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988812 RETURNED 2/7/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PHILLIPS/W./CORY - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  57. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988815 RETURNED 2/7/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SMITH-KING/ROBYN/ - REFUSED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  58. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988824 RETURNED 2/5/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF KAREN CARLISLE - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  59. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55988823 RETURNED 2/5/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CARLISLE/KAREN/ - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  60. UMS COMPLAINT(55988824) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF KAREN CARLISLE 18710 LONGVIEW AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  61. UMS COMPLAINT(55988823) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KAREN CARLISLE 18710 LONGVIEW AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  62. UMS COMPLAINT(55988822) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE OR JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF STEVEN D. SMITH 14100 LAKESHORE BLVD., #409 CLEVELAND, OH 44110
  63. UMS COMPLAINT(55988821) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STEVEN D. SMITH 14100 LAKESHORE BLVD., #409 CLEVELAND, OH 44110
  64. UMS COMPLAINT(55988820) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF DONNA J. SMITH 5151 LEE ROAD APT 202 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  65. UMS COMPLAINT(55988819) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DONNA J. SMITH 5151 LEE ROAD APT 202 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  66. UMS COMPLAINT(55988818) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF ALAIN TRICE 3488 WOODRIDGE ROAD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44121
  67. UMS COMPLAINT(55988817) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ALAIN TRICE 3488 WOODRIDGE ROAD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44121
  68. UMS COMPLAINT(55988816) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF ROBYN SMITH-KING 3209 EAST 134TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44120
  69. UMS COMPLAINT(55988815) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ROBYN SMITH-KING 3209 EAST 134TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44120
  70. UMS COMPLAINT(55988814) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN OR JANE DOE, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF MARCIA HOOD 4550 LEE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  71. UMS COMPLAINT(55988813) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARCIA HOOD 4550 LEE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  72. UMS COMPLAINT(55988812) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: W. CORY PHILLIPS 30100 CHAGRIN BLVD SUITE 350 CLEVELAND, OH 44124
  73. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  74. AGISTRATE PAUL LUCAS ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  75. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  76. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  77. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  78. RIT FEE
  79. RIT FEE
  80. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  81. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  82. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  83. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  84. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  85. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  86. RIT FEE
  87. RIT FEE
  88. RIT FEE
  89. RIT FEE
  90. RIT FEE
  91. RIT FEE
  92. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  93. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  94. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  95. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  96. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  97. RIT FEE
  98. RIT FEE
  99. RIT FEE
  100. RIT FEE
  101. RIT FEE
  102. UDGE RICHARD A BELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  103. DDITIONAL DEPOSIT FOR SERVICE, OVER 10 DEFENDANTS $25
  104. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  105. EGAL RESEARCH
  106. EGAL NEWS
  107. EGAL AID
  108. OMPUTER FEE
  109. LERK'S FEE
  110. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT
  111. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more