Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-18
Type Dissolution
Docket 43 entries
Disposition DEFAULT
Photo of Hon. Hammers Pamela B

Judge

Hon. Hammers Pamela B

Creek County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. FILE AND ENTER PETITION
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS
  14. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  15. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  16. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  17. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  18. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  19. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  20. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  21. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  22. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  23. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  24. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  25. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  26. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  27. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-BUNDY LAW
  28. ENTRY OF APPREARANCE - NICHOLAS K. WOODWARD FOR RESPONDENT JAN DAVIS
  29. ANSWER TO PETITION AND COUNTERCLAIM
  30. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR THE PETITIONER
  31. ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL
  32. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  33. ENTRY OF PETITIONER'S DRUG TEST RESULTS
  34. PER BAILIFF'S CALENDAR NEXT DATE SET 5/27/25 AT 1:30PM (BD)
  35. CM:JS:NO CSR:5/23/25-THIS MATTER IS SET ON 5/27/2025 AT 1:30 PM BEFORE JUDGE HAMMERS IN COURTROOM #3
  36. CM:PH:NO CSR:5/27/2025-RESPONDENT PRESENT WITH NICHOLAS WOODWARD-MATTER IS CONTINUED TO 6/17/2025 AT 130 FOR DEFAULT
  37. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  38. ORDER SETTING DEFAULT HEARING
  39. CM:PH:NO CSR:6/17/2025-DEFAULT COURT DATE FOR SERVICE-NICHOLAS PRESENT FOR RESPONDENT-MATTER IS CONTINUED TO 7/1/2025 AT 130 PM
  40. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  41. CM:PH:NO CSR:7/1/25-PETITIONER PRESENT-NICHOLAS PRESENT WITH RESPONDENT-DEFAULT TEMPORARY ORDER-MATTER IS CONTINUED TO 8/12/2025 AT 130 PM-PETITIONER ORDERED TO GET HOUSE READY TO SELL-NO OTHER PERSONS SHALL BE LIVING ON THE PROPERTY-ALIMONY $1000 BY 7/15/25 AND $1000 BY 7/31/25 AND $2000 ON THE 15TH OF EACH MONTH AFTER JULY-NO ONE IS TO DESTROY OR SELL ANY MARITAL PROPERTY.
  42. CM:PH:NO CSR:8/12/25-STRICKEN-NO APPEARANCES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more