Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-30
Status Open
Type 43 Unlimited Other Petition (not Specified)
Docket 43 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Carpenter, Amber
Defendant Guynes, Sally
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Request for orders to stop Harassment filed
  2. Order Received for Signature
  3. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 97E Order for: Notice of Hearing
  4. Order Received for Signature
  5. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 97E Order for: TRO
  6. Order Received for Signature
  7. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 97E Order for: Courts Findings
  8. Order Received for Signature
  9. Comment Pending Hearing Order for: After Hearing
  10. Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order
  11. Original Type Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order
  12. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  13. Hearing Time 5:33 PM
  14. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  15. Notice of Hearing and TRO
  16. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  17. Comment Temporary Restraining Order Granted. Date: Time: 8:30 am Dept: 97E
  18. Proof of Service
  19. Substitution of Attorney Filed
  20. Comment Old Attorney: Pro Se New Attorney: Christopher M. Rusca
  21. Document filed
  22. Comment Transcripts of Electronic Recordings Pursuant to CRC 2.1040
  23. List filed
  24. Comment Petitioner's Exhibit List
  25. Show Cause Regard Harassment
  26. Original Type Show Cause Regard Harassment
  27. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  28. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  29. Result Commenced
  30. Petitioner: Carpenter, Amber
  31. Attorney: Rusca, Christopher M
  32. Respondent: Guynes, Sally
  33. Appeared in Person
  34. Oral stipulation and consent for the appointment of court
  35. Comment Commissioner as temporary Judge
  36. Request Filed
  37. Comment To Continue Court Hearing
  38. Reissue TRO Harassment
  39. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  40. Comment Date: Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: 97E
  41. Minute Order Attachment
  42. Show Cause Regard Harassment
  43. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more