Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-21
Type Dissolution
Docket 26 entries
Photo of Hon. HAKE, KELLY

Judge

Hon. HAKE, KELLY

Creek County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS ISSUED TO LUKE ROSENBERGER RETURNED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE
  14. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  15. ORDER (HELPING CHILDREN COPE WITH DIVORCE) COPY GIVEN BACK TO ATTORNEY
  16. UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICITON AND ENFORCEMENT ACT (UCCJEA) AFFIDAVIT
  17. NOTICE AND ORDER SETTING TEMPORARY ORDER HEARING
  18. NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER OF INTEREST BY CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES
  19. ORDER
  20. SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED 2-21-25 TO LUKE ROSENBERGER
  21. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - LACOURSE LAW, PLLC FOR LUKE ROSENBERGER
  22. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE AND COUNTERCLAIM TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS
  23. CM:KH:NO CSR: 2-24-25 APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER: PETITIONER PRESENT WITH COUNSEL KENDAL KELLY. RESEPONDENT PRESENT HEARING HELD. RESPONDENT TO VACATE MARITAL RESEIDENCE BY 5 PM ON MONDAY FEB. 24, 2025. RESPONDENT TO HAVE VISITATION WITHMINOR CHILDREN AS FOLLOWS: WEDNESDAY FROM 3 TO 9, FRIDAY FROM 3 TO 6 AND SUNDAY AFTER CHURCH UNTIL 6 PM. COURT ORDERS THAT NO PARTY IS TO SPEAK OF THIS MATTER WITH OR IN THE PRESENCE OF THE MINOR CHILDREN. TEMPORARY ORDER HEARING SET 3-3-25 AT 3:30
  24. CM:KH:NO CSR; 2-28-25 TEMPORARY ORDER: KENDAL KELLY PRESENT WITH PETITIONER. RESPONDENT PRESENT. SEE SEPARATE MINUTE
  25. CM:KH:NO CSR: 3-3-25 APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER: PARTIES SHALL HAVE JOINT CUSTODY OF THE CHILDREN, WITH VISITATION PURSUANT TO THE AGREED SCHEDULE. PETITIONER SHALL BE AWARDED TEMPORARY POSSESSION OF THE MARITAL HOME, AND RESPONDENT IS AWARDED TEMPORARY POSSESSION OF THE CABIN AND THE ANIMAL BUSINESS ON THE PROPERTY. RESPONDENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FEEDING AND CARRING FOR THE ANIMALS BUT MUST PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE HOUR'S ADVANCE NOTICE TO PETITIONER BEFORE ENTERING THE PROPERTY (OR MAY PROVIDE NOTICE THE NIGHT BEFORE IF HE PLANS ON FEEDING ANIMALS IN THE MORNING) RESPONDENT SHALL CONTINUE TO PAY ALL BILLS HE HAS PREVOUSLY PAID INCLUDING CAR INSURANCE, MORGAGE, UTILITIES, ETC. THE CHILDREN SHALL BE ALLOWED TO GO TO COUNSLING AND PARTIES SHALL FOLLOW ALL RECOMENDATIONS OF COUNSELOR. THERE SHALL BE NO DERAGATORY STATEMENTS OR DISCUSSION OF LITIGATION IN THE PRESENT OF/WITHIN EARSHOT OF THE CHILDREN. THE CHILDREN SHALL BE ALLOWED TO VIST THE OTHER PARENTS HOUSE UPON GIVEN NOTICE AND FOR A REASENABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. MARITAL PROPERTY TO BE APPRAISED BY DOUG FOOTE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER AT REPONDENTS EXPENSE. PETITONER TO TRANSPORT CHILDREN TO SCHOOL EVERY MONDAY THOUGH THURSDAY. RESPONDENT TO PICK UP CHILDREN FROM SCHOOL ON HIS VISITATION DAYS. UPON EXCHANGE OF DISCOVERY AND APPRAISAL, PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION WITHIN 30 DAYS. CHILD SUPPORT ORDERED PURSUANT TO OKLAHOMA CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES. TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVISED BY PARTIES - VISITATION SCHEDUAL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.