Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-18
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Absolute Resolutions Investments, Llc
Defendant Sierra L Reid
Photo of Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Judge

Hon. MAUREEN CLANCY

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58378017) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANTHONY HUSPASKA [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58378016) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANTHONY HUSPASKA [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58378015) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID B BOKOR [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58378014) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID B BOKOR [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58378013) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: R J BUDWAY [email protected]
  7. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT ON PLAINTIFF, ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT SIERRA REID ("DEFENDANT"), FILED 09/09/2025. AS OF 10/09/2025, NO BRIEF IN OPPOSITION HAS BEEN FILED. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 56, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS APPROPRIATE WHEN (1) THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT, (2) THE MOVING PARTY IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, AND (3) REASONABLE MINDS CAN COME TO BUT ONE CONCLUSION, AND THAT CONCLUSION IS ADVERSE TO THE NONMOVING PARTY, THAT PARTY BEING ENTITLED TO HAVE THE EVIDENCE CONSTRUED MOST STRONGLY IN HIS FAVOR. HORTON V. HARWICK CHEM. CORP, 73 OHIO ST.3D 679, 1995-OHIO-286, 653 N.E.2D 1196, PARAGRAPH THREE OF THE SYLLABUS (OHIO 1995). THE PARTY MOVING FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BEARS THE BURDEN OF SHOWING THAT THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT AND THAT HE IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. DRESHER V. BURT, 75 OHIO ST.3D 280, 292-293, 1996-OHIO-107, 662 N.E.2D 264, 273-274 (OHIO 1996). "ONCE THE MOVING PARTY SATISFIES ITS BURDEN, THE NONMOVING PARTY 'MAY NOT REST UPON THE MERE ALLEGATIONS OR DENIALS OF THE PARTY'S PLEADINGS, BUT THE PARTY'S RESPONSE, BY AFFIDAVIT OR AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS RULE, MUST SET FORTH SPECIFIC FACTS SHOWING THAT THERE IS A GENUINE ISSUE FOR TRIAL.' CIV. R. 56(E); MOOTISPAW V. ECKSTEIN, 76 OHIO ST.3D 383, 385, 667 N.E.2D 1197 (1996). DOUBTS MUST BE RESOLVED IN FAVOR OF THE NON-MOVING PARTY. MURPHY V. REYNOLDSBURG, 65 OHIO ST.3D 356, 358-359, 604 N.E.2D 138 (1992).'" COLLIER V. LIBATIONS LOUNGE, LLC., 8TH DIST. CUYAHOGA NO. 97504, 2012-OHIO-2390, 7. PLAINTIFF BROUGHT ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR NONPAYMENT OF A CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT. "CREDIT CARD AGREEMENTS ARE CONTRACTS WHEREBY THE ISSUANCE AND USE OF A CREDIT CARD CREATES A LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT." CAP. ONE, N.A. V. HOWARD, 2024-OHIO-275, P12, 2024 OHIO APP. LEXIS 278, *4, 2024 WL 302444. "AN ACTION ON ACCOUNT IS REALLY ONE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT. KWIKCOLOR SAND V. FAIRMOUNT MINERALS LTD., 8TH DIST. CUYAHOGA NO. 96717, 2011-OHIO-6646, 13. [T]O PROVE A BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM A PLAINTIFF MUST DEMONSTRATE BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT: (1) A CONTRACT EXISTED, (2) THE PLAINTIFF FULFILLED HIS OBLIGATIONS, (3) THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO FULFILL HIS OBLIGATIONS, AND (4) DAMAGES RESULTED FROM THIS FAILURE." CIRCUIT SOLUTIONS, INC. V. MUELLER ELEC. CO., 9TH DIST. NO. 07CA009139, 2008 OHIO 3048, 12. IN SUPPORT OF ITS' MOTION, PLAINTIFF PROVIDES THE AFFIDAVIT OF AUDREY FERMANICH ("AFFIANT") AN EMPLOYEE AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR PLAINTIFF. AFFIANT ATTESTS THAT SHE INSPECTED THE ACCOUNT RECORDS ATTACHED TO HER AFFIDAVIT, INCLUDING THE BILL OF ASSIGNMENT ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A AND STATEMENTS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT B. AFFIANT FURTHER ATTESTS THAT DEFENDANT OPENED THE CARD ACCOUNT AND THAT THE EXHIBITS REFLECT THE BALANCE OWED IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,299.32. UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, THE COURT HEREBY GRANTS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED 09/09/2025. THE COURT, HAVING CONSIDERED ALL OF THE EVIDENCE AND HAVING CONSTRUED THE EVIDENCE IN A LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO THE NONMOVING PARTY, DETERMINES THAT REASONABLE MINDS CAN COME TO BUT ONE CONCLUSION, THAT THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT AND THAT PLAINTIFF, ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC, IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT SIERRA REID. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,299.32, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT AT THE STATUTORY RATE OF 8.00% PER ANNUM AND COSTS. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID B BOKOR 0061515 MILITARY SERVICE AFFIDAVIT
  9. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  10. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 06/23/2025. ALL PARTIES APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING LITIGATION SCHEDULE: DISCOVERY CUT-OFF IS 08/25/2025 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 09/15/2025. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 6(C), AMENDED AS OF JULY 1, 2019, BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE DUE WITHIN 28 DAYS, AND REPLIES ARE DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS. A PAPER COURTESY COPY OF ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, EXHIBITS, AND DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS SHALL BE HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT UPON FILING OF THE MOTION. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION TO ALL NON-SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS, EXCEPT MOTIONS IN LIMINE, EXPLAINED BELOW, ARE DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS. ANY REPLIES ARE DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS. PARTIES ARE TO CONFER REGARDING NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS BEFORE FILING AND INDICATE THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT WHERE POSSIBLE. ANY MOTION FILED WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF ALL OTHER PARTIES WILL BE DENIED IF THE MOTION DOES NOT LEAVE TIME FOR THE OTHER PARTIES TO RESPOND PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 6(C). PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET AND CONFER, AND TO CONTACT THE COURT TO SCHEDULE A DISCOVERY CONFERENCE PRIOR TO FILING A MOTION TO COMPEL OR ANY OTHER DISCOVERY RELATED MOTION. PARTIES WISHING TO CONTACT THE COURT MAY ONLY DO SO BY 1) CALLING THE COURT AT 216-698-2892 WITH ALL COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES ON THE LINE, 2) EMAILING [email protected] WITH ALL COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES COPIED, OR 3) THROUGH A FILING WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS. THIS COURT SHALL NOT ENTERTAIN ANY COMMUNICATION FROM EITHER SIDE WITHOUT BOTH SIDES BEING PRESENT ON THE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 01/21/2026 AT 10:30 A.M. AND WILL BE HELD BY PHONE. PARTIES CAN ACCESS THE CONFERENCE BY CALLING 605-313-5952 AND ENTERING ACCESS CODE 1742872#. TRIAL SET FOR 02/04/2026 AT 09:30 A.M. ALL PARTIES ARE TO SUBMIT TRIAL BRIEFS, EXHIBIT LISTS, WITNESS LISTS, STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS, VERDICT FORMS, INTERROGATORIES, OBJECTIONS TO WITNESS TESTIMONY, AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE TO THE COURT AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. JURY INSTRUCTIONS, INTERROGATORIES, AND VERDICT FORMS MUST BE FILED WITH THE CLERK AND SUBMITTED IN MICROSOFT WORD FORMAT TO [email protected]. PAPER COURTESY COPIES OF ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, MOTIONS TO COMPEL OR OTHER MOTIONS OVER 10 PAGES LONG MUST BE HAND-DELIVERED TO COURTROOM 20-B OR OTHERWISE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED PROPERLY FILED. FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO APPEAR AT ANY SCHEDULED DATE OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY COURT ORDER MAY RESULT IN AN ADVERSE RESULT FOR THE NON-APPEARING/NON-COMPLYING PARTY, I.E., THE PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 01/21/2026 AT 10:30 AM. TRIAL SET FOR 02/04/2026 AT 09:30 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. CASE CALLED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 06/04/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS CONTINUED UNTIL 06/23/2025 AT 10:00 A.M. PARTIES CAN ACCESS THE CONFERENCE BY CALLING 605-313-5952 AND ENTERING ACCESS CODE 1742872#. A CASE SCHEDULE WILL BE SET AT THAT TIME WITH INPUT FROM ANY PARTIES IN ATTENDANCE. FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO APPEAR AT ANY SCHEDULED DATE OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY COURT ORDER MAY RESULT IN AN ADVERSE RESULT FOR THE NON-APPEARING/NON-COMPLYING PARTY, I.E., THE PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/23/2025 AT 10:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. CASE CALLED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 05/05/2025. ALL PARTIES APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. AT THE REQUEST OF THE PARTIES, THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS CONTINUED UNTIL 06/04/2025 AT 10:00 A.M. TO ALLOW THE PARTIES AN OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS RESOLUTION. PARTIES CAN ACCESS THE CONFERENCE BY CALLING 605-313-5952 AND ENTERING ACCESS CODE 1742872#. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/04/2025 AT 10:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/01/2025 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  14. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, FILED 04/07/2025. UPON CONSIDERATION, THE MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE RESET FOR 05/05/2025 AT 10:00 AM. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD BY PHONE. PARTIES CAN ACCESS THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY CALLING 605-313-5952 AND ENTERING ACCESS CODE 1742872#. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 26, THE PARTIES MUST MEET AND CONFER NO LATER THAN 21 DAYS BEFORE THE CMC. THE PARTIES MUST FILE A DISCOVERY PLAN WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THEIR CONFERENCE. EACH PARTY MUST PROVIDE INITIAL DISCLOSURES TO THE OTHER PARTIES BY THE DATE OF THE CMC UNLESS THE PARTIES STIPULATE TO A LATER DATE. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 05/05/2025 AT 10:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. D1 SIERRA L REID'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE R J BUDWAY 0061224. ^F^ MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  16. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR BUDWAY/R J/ 04/04/2025 17:01:58
  17. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR HUSPASKA/ANTHONY/ 04/04/2025 17:01:58
  18. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 05/01/2025 AT 09:00 AM. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD BY PHONE. PARTIES CAN ACCESS THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY CALLING 605-313-5952 AND ENTERING ACCESS CODE 1742872#. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 26, THE PARTIES MUST MEET AND CONFER NO LATER THAN 21 DAYS BEFORE THE CMC. THE PARTIES MUST FILE A DISCOVERY PLAN WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THEIR CONFERENCE. EACH PARTY MUST PROVIDE INITIAL DISCLOSURES TO THE OTHER PARTIES BY THE DATE OF THE CMC UNLESS THE PARTIES STIPULATE TO A LATER DATE.
  19. ANSWER FILED BY D1 SIERRA L REID ATTORNEY R J BUDWAY 0061224 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SIERRA REID
  20. USPS RECEIPT NO. 56179732 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/26/2025 REID/SIERRA/L PROCESSED BY COC 03/05/2025.
  21. SUMS COMPLAINT(56179732) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SIERRA L REID 11839 CLIFTON BLVD APT 109 LAKEWOOD, OH 44107
  22. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  23. WRIT FEE
  24. JUDGE JENNIFER O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM) - VOIDED. DUE TO RECUSAL ON CASE NO. CV25111664 AND PURSUANT TO COURT POLICY, CASE NO. CV25112354 IS REASSIGNED TO JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY (MANUAL).
  25. LEGAL RESEARCH
  26. LEGAL NEWS
  27. LEGAL AID
  28. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  29. COMPUTER FEE
  30. CLERK'S FEE
  31. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ANTHONY HUSPASKA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.