Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-23
Type Cc Foreclosure
Docket 21 entries
Disposition consent judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Monticello Recreation Corporation|Lutfiyya, Rob A|Reiter, Amanda S
Defendant Anders, Steven M|Anders, Emily D
Photo of Hon. Pelikan Daniel G

Judge

Hon. Pelikan Daniel G

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. arn Release/Return/Recall Return on Garnishment/Execution Number 24-EXEC-119
  4. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 24-EXEC-119; Served To - ST CHARLES COUNTY SHERIFF; Served Date - 12/13/2024; Served Time - 06:55:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
  6. ote to Clerk eFiling
  7. otice of Service 24-EXEC-119; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  9. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 24-EXEC-119 for STEVEN M ANDERS; AND EMILY D. ANDERS; returnable date: 20-FEB-2025; Garnishee: ST CHARLES COUNTY SHERIFF
  10. equest for Execution/Garnish Execution Application and Order; Legal Description. Filed By: ROB A LUTFIYYA On Behalf Of: MONTICELLO RECREATION CORPORATION
  11. udgment Entered IN FAVOR OF PLNTFF AND AGAINST THE DEFT'S IN THE SUM OF $3,437.85. DEFT FURTHER AGREE TO PAY ALL FUTURE ASSESSMENTS IN FULL AS THEY BECOME DUE. AS PER MEMO. DGP/Gdb
  12. udgment Entered IN FAVOR OF PLNTFF AND AGAINST THE DEFT'S IN THE SUM OF $3,437.85. DEFT FURTHER AGREE TO PAY ALL FUTURE ASSESSMENTS IN FULL AS THEY BECOME DUE. AS PER MEMO. DGP/Gdb
  13. onsent Judgment
  14. onsent Filed Consent Judgment; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROB A LUTFIYYA On Behalf Of: MONTICELLO RECREATION CORPORATION
  15. rder - Special Process Server
  16. otion Special Process Server Request for Appointment of Special Process Server; Affidavit of Special Process Server; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROB A LUTFIYYA On Behalf Of: MONTICELLO RECREATION CORPORATION
  17. ummons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 24-SMCC-1235, for ANDERS, STEVEN M SUMMONS SAVED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. SPA
  18. ummons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 24-SMCC-1234, for ANDERS, EMILY D SUMMONS SAVED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. SPA
  19. udge/Clerk - Note SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER CANNOT BE APPROVED AT THIS TIME. BEGINNING MAY 1, 2024, EVERY REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER MUST HAVE AN AFFIDAVIT ATTACHED STATING THE SERVER QUALIFIES PER THE RULE. THE AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE ARE ON THE COURTS WEBSITE. SPA
  20. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: ROB A LUTFIYYA
  21. otion Special Process Server Request for Appointment of Special Process Server. Filed By: ROB A LUTFIYYA On Behalf Of: MONTICELLO RECREATION CORPORATION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more